FUPBY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Heidelberg Materials AG has a net margin of 9.38% compared to FUCHS SE's net margin of --. FUCHS SE's return on equity of 15.63% beat Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 10%.

FUCHS SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Heidelberg Materials AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUCHS SE has higher upside potential than Heidelberg Materials AG, analysts believe FUCHS SE is more attractive than Heidelberg Materials AG.

FUCHS SE has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.138%.

FUCHS SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Heidelberg Materials AG offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.69 per share. FUCHS SE pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG pays out 33.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUCHS SE quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues of --. FUCHS SE's net income of $98.2M is higher than Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of --. Notably, FUCHS SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while Heidelberg Materials AG's PE ratio is 22.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUCHS SE is 1.48x versus 1.96x for Heidelberg Materials AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a net margin of 9.38% compared to FUCHS SE's net margin of -4.3%. FUCHS SE's return on equity of 15.63% beat KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's return on equity of 9.94%.

FUCHS SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUCHS SE has higher upside potential than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA, analysts believe FUCHS SE is more attractive than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA.

FUCHS SE has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.11%.

FUCHS SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. FUCHS SE pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUCHS SE quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA quarterly revenues of $266.7M. FUCHS SE's net income of $98.2M is higher than KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's net income of -$11.5M. Notably, FUCHS SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA's PE ratio is 91.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUCHS SE is 1.48x versus 1.46x for KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

K+S AG has a net margin of 9.38% compared to FUCHS SE's net margin of 0.25%. FUCHS SE's return on equity of 15.63% beat K+S AG's return on equity of -32.05%.

FUCHS SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand K+S AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUCHS SE has higher upside potential than K+S AG, analysts believe FUCHS SE is more attractive than K+S AG.

FUCHS SE has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison K+S AG has a beta of 0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.712%.

FUCHS SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. K+S AG offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. FUCHS SE pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. K+S AG pays out 188.57% of its earnings as a dividend. FUCHS SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but K+S AG's is not.

FUCHS SE quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than K+S AG quarterly revenues of $1B. FUCHS SE's net income of $98.2M is higher than K+S AG's net income of $2.6M. Notably, FUCHS SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while K+S AG's PE ratio is 100.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUCHS SE is 1.48x versus 0.67x for K+S AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGL Carbon SE has a net margin of 9.38% compared to FUCHS SE's net margin of -9.87%. FUCHS SE's return on equity of 15.63% beat SGL Carbon SE's return on equity of -28.96%.

FUCHS SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGL Carbon SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUCHS SE has higher upside potential than SGL Carbon SE, analysts believe FUCHS SE is more attractive than SGL Carbon SE.

FUCHS SE has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.225% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGL Carbon SE has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.617%.

FUCHS SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. SGL Carbon SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FUCHS SE pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. SGL Carbon SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FUCHS SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUCHS SE quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than SGL Carbon SE quarterly revenues of $233.4M. FUCHS SE's net income of $98.2M is higher than SGL Carbon SE's net income of -$23M. Notably, FUCHS SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.81x while SGL Carbon SE's PE ratio is 7.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUCHS SE is 1.48x versus 0.44x for SGL Carbon SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.