Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
64
IAUFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.40
Seasonality move
:
9.13%
Day range:
$0.44 - $0.44
52-week range:
$0.14 - $0.44
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
23.63x
P/S ratio:
2.18x
P/B ratio:
3.74x
Volume:
1K
Avg. volume:
1.7K
1-year change:
140.38%
Market cap:
$351M
Revenue:
$122.8M
EPS (TTM):
$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $54.75 |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $10.00 |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines Ltd.
|
$0.44 | -- | $351M | 23.63x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.18x |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
$63.86 | $54.75 | $162.1B | 17.16x | $1.20 | 3.45% | 3.17x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
$5.97 | -- | $351.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
$7.16 | $10.00 | $269.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.03 | -- | $11.1M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines Ltd.
|
10.79% | 0.451 | -- | 2.38x |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
30.73% | 0.091 | -- | 1.21x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | 0.527 | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | 2.607 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.807 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.29% | 6.71% | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 16.7% | 23.67% | -- | -- |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
AIC Mines Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or BHP?
BHP Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.71% beat BHP Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.-- -- $159.7M BHPBHP Group Ltd.-- -- $69.8B -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or BHP?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could fall by -14.27%. Given that BHP Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than AIC Mines Ltd., analysts believe BHP Group Ltd. is more attractive than AIC Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.0 0 0 BHPBHP Group Ltd.2 3 1 -
Is IAUFF or BHP More Risky?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.063%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or BHP?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. AIC Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd. pays out 61.13% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or BHP?
AIC Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than BHP Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.63x while BHP Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines Ltd. is 2.18x versus 3.17x for BHP Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.2.18x 23.63x -- -- BHPBHP Group Ltd.3.17x 17.16x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or IONR?
ioneer Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.71% beat ioneer Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.-- -- $159.7M IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or IONR?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ioneer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 369.01%. Given that ioneer Ltd. has higher upside potential than AIC Mines Ltd., analysts believe ioneer Ltd. is more attractive than AIC Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.0 0 0 IONRioneer Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or IONR More Risky?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ioneer Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or IONR?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ioneer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ioneer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or IONR?
AIC Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ioneer Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than ioneer Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.63x while ioneer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines Ltd. is 2.18x versus -- for ioneer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.2.18x 23.63x -- -- IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or NVA?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.71% beat Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.-- -- $159.7M NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or NVA?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.67%. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than AIC Mines Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than AIC Mines Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.0 0 0 NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or NVA More Risky?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or NVA?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or NVA?
AIC Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.63x while Nova Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines Ltd. is 2.18x versus -- for Nova Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.2.18x 23.63x -- -- NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines Ltd.'s net margin of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.71% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.-- -- $159.7M SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or SBMSF?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe AIC Mines Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or SBMSF More Risky?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 71.034% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.143%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or SBMSF?
AIC Mines Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AIC Mines Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or SBMSF?
AIC Mines Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.63x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines Ltd. is 2.18x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines Ltd.2.18x 23.63x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
70
RGC alert for Jan 8
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is down 21.5% over the past day.
Buy
64
RVMD alert for Jan 8
Revolution Medicines, Inc. [RVMD] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Sell
38
CRNX alert for Jan 8
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [CRNX] is down 0.23% over the past day.
