BHP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $51.90, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95.9%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than BHP Group.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.85x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.30x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 20.21%.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $51.90, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $79.02 which suggests that it could grow by 32.37%. Given that Rio Tinto PLC has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Rio Tinto PLC is more attractive than BHP Group.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.002%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 6.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 60.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.85x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.30x versus 1.82x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern Copper has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of 30.3%. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Southern Copper's return on equity of 40.73%.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $51.90, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Southern Copper has an analysts' consensus of $92.29 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Southern Copper, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Southern Copper.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern Copper has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.771%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. Southern Copper offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern Copper pays out 48.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Southern Copper quarterly revenues of $3.1B. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Southern Copper's net income of $945.9M. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.85x while Southern Copper's PE ratio is 20.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.30x versus 6.01x for Southern Copper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sims has a net margin of -- compared to BHP Group's net margin of --. BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67% beat Sims's return on equity of -4.33%.

BHP Group has a consensus price target of $51.90, signalling upside risk potential of 6.75%. On the other hand Sims has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Sims, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Sims.

BHP Group has a beta of 0.872, which suggesting that the stock is 12.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sims has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.002%.

BHP Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.1%. Sims offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. BHP Group pays 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Sims pays out -70.24% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BHP Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sims quarterly revenues of --. BHP Group's net income of -- is lower than Sims's net income of --. Notably, BHP Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.85x while Sims's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BHP Group is 2.30x versus 0.43x for Sims. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.