Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
38
NVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.97
Seasonality move
:
12.08%
Day range:
$5.69 - $6.15
52-week range:
$1.68 - $16.28
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.04x
Volume:
411.6K
Avg. volume:
635.9K
1-year change:
172.6%
Market cap:
$220.8M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.45
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $10.00 |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $65.71 |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
$5.97 | $10.00 | $220.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
$73.24 | $65.71 | $185.2B | 18.16x | $1.46 | 3.65% | 3.45x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.44x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
$3.93 | -- | $233.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.33 | -- | $510.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 6.1% | 0.23x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $25.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | 4.226 | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
30.73% | 0.392 | -- | 1.21x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | 0.200 | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -2.321 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | 0.532 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 16.7% | 23.67% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Nova Minerals Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or BHP?
BHP Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat BHP Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- BHPBHP Group Ltd.-- -- $69.8B -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.5%. On the other hand BHP Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $65.71 which suggests that it could fall by -9.89%. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than BHP Group Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than BHP Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 BHPBHP Group Ltd.2 4 0 -
Is NVA or BHP More Risky?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.153%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd. pays out 61.13% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than BHP Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BHP Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 3.45x for BHP Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -- BHPBHP Group Ltd.3.45x 18.16x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or FTZZF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.5%. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NVA or FTZZF More Risky?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 188.443%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or FTZZF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or FTZZF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 1.44x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.44x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or IONR?
ioneer Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat ioneer Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or IONR?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.5%. On the other hand ioneer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 612.47%. Given that ioneer Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nova Minerals Ltd., analysts believe ioneer Ltd. is more attractive than Nova Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 IONRioneer Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NVA or IONR More Risky?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ioneer Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or IONR?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ioneer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ioneer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or IONR?
Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ioneer Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than ioneer Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ioneer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for ioneer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -- IONRioneer Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or NUFMF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.5%. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NVA or NUFMF More Risky?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.282%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or NUFMF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 6.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or NUFMF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals Ltd. is -- versus 0.23x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.23x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or SBMSF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 67.5%. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals Ltd.1 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NVA or SBMSF More Risky?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.432%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or SBMSF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or SBMSF?
Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals Ltd. is -- versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals Ltd.-- -- -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
