3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Sell
48
NVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.30
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$11.79 - $12.49
52-week range:
$4.35 - $19.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.04x
Volume:
9.2K
Avg. volume:
24.6K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$64.3M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$1.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $51.90 |
|
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PEIMF
Power Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMSMY
Sims
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$12.28 | -- | $64.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
$48.67 | $51.90 | $123.5B | 10.86x | $1.00 | 5.1% | 2.31x |
|
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
|
$0.0370 | -- | $23.8M | 0.76x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.11x |
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
$0.23 | -- | $132.5M | 14.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.07x |
|
PEIMF
Power Minerals
|
$0.0567 | -- | $7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 207.50x |
|
SMSMY
Sims
|
$9.85 | -- | $1.9B | 36.02x | $0.06 | 1.32% | 0.43x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
30.73% | 0.426 | 15.79% | 1.21x |
|
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
|
-- | -4.353 | -- | -- |
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
10.79% | 1.889 | 17.99% | 2.38x |
|
PEIMF
Power Minerals
|
4.56% | 1.014 | 9.3% | 0.68x |
|
SMSMY
Sims
|
17.81% | -0.020 | 25.96% | 0.94x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 16.7% | 23.67% | -- | -- |
|
GSMGF
Indiana Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
-- | -- | 6.29% | 6.71% | -- | -- |
|
PEIMF
Power Minerals
|
-- | -- | -61.99% | -63.5% | -- | -- |
|
SMSMY
Sims
|
-- | -- | -3.4% | -4.33% | -- | -- |
Nova Minerals vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or BHP?
BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- BHPBHP Group-- -- $69.8B -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.58%. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $51.90 which suggests that it could grow by 6.64%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than BHP Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 BHPBHP Group3 3 0 -
Is NVA or BHP More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.85%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BHP Group's PE ratio is 10.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 2.31x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- BHPBHP Group2.31x 10.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or GSMGF?
Indiana Resources has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Indiana Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- GSMGFIndiana Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or GSMGF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.58%. On the other hand Indiana Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Indiana Resources, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Indiana Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 GSMGFIndiana Resources0 0 0 -
Is NVA or GSMGF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Indiana Resources has a beta of 4.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 341.564%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or GSMGF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Indiana Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Indiana Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or GSMGF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Indiana Resources quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Indiana Resources's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Indiana Resources's PE ratio is 0.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 0.11x for Indiana Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- GSMGFIndiana Resources0.11x 0.76x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or IAUFF?
AIC Mines has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- IAUFFAIC Mines-- -- $159.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or IAUFF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.58%. On the other hand AIC Mines has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than AIC Mines.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 IAUFFAIC Mines0 0 0 -
Is NVA or IAUFF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AIC Mines has a beta of 0.297, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.343%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or IAUFF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AIC Mines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AIC Mines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or IAUFF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AIC Mines quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than AIC Mines's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AIC Mines's PE ratio is 14.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 1.07x for AIC Mines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- IAUFFAIC Mines1.07x 14.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or PEIMF?
Power Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Power Minerals's return on equity of -63.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- PEIMFPower Minerals-- -- $13.4M -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or PEIMF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.58%. On the other hand Power Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Power Minerals, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Power Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 PEIMFPower Minerals0 0 0 -
Is NVA or PEIMF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Minerals has a beta of -7.250, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 825.027%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or PEIMF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or PEIMF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Power Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 207.50x for Power Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- PEIMFPower Minerals207.50x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or SMSMY?
Sims has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Sims's return on equity of -4.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- SMSMYSims-- -- $2.1B -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or SMSMY?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 103.58%. On the other hand Sims has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Sims, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Sims.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 SMSMYSims0 0 0 -
Is NVA or SMSMY More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sims has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.002%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or SMSMY?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sims offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sims pays out -70.24% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or SMSMY?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sims quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Sims's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sims's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 0.43x for Sims. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- SMSMYSims0.43x 36.02x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
