Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
44
SBMSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.06
Seasonality move
:
6.33%
Day range:
$0.06 - $0.06
52-week range:
$0.03 - $0.17
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
47.38x
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
1.05x
Volume:
1.5K
Avg. volume:
14.7K
1-year change:
-57.31%
Market cap:
$20.4M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $20.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
$0.0520 | -- | $45.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 120.55x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.25x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.60x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
$0.35 | -- | $93M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 208.61x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.52 | -- | $581.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.26x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.421 | -- | -- |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
50.34% | 0.062 | -- | 0.42x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
38.76% | -0.121 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | 0.324 | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -3.351 | -- | 1.20x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -53.94% | -81.87% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
Danakali Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SBMSF or FGPHF?
First Graphene Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Danakali Ltd.'s net margin of --. Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat First Graphene Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- FGPHFFirst Graphene Ltd.-- -- $4.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SBMSF or FGPHF?
Danakali Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Graphene Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Danakali Ltd. has higher upside potential than First Graphene Ltd., analysts believe Danakali Ltd. is more attractive than First Graphene Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 FGPHFFirst Graphene Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SBMSF or FGPHF More Risky?
Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.229% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Graphene Ltd. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.151%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBMSF or FGPHF?
Danakali Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Graphene Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Danakali Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Graphene Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBMSF or FGPHF?
Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Graphene Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Danakali Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than First Graphene Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Danakali Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.38x while First Graphene Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danakali Ltd. is -- versus 120.55x for First Graphene Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- -- FGPHFFirst Graphene Ltd.120.55x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SBMSF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Danakali Ltd.'s net margin of --. Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SBMSF or FTZZF?
Danakali Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Danakali Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Danakali Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SBMSF or FTZZF More Risky?
Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.229% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBMSF or FTZZF?
Danakali Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Danakali Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBMSF or FTZZF?
Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Danakali Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Danakali Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.38x while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danakali Ltd. is -- versus 1.25x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SBMSF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Danakali Ltd.'s net margin of --. Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SBMSF or HMIFF?
Danakali Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Danakali Ltd. has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Danakali Ltd. is more attractive than Harvest Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SBMSF or HMIFF More Risky?
Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.229% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBMSF or HMIFF?
Danakali Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Danakali Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBMSF or HMIFF?
Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Danakali Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Danakali Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.38x while Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danakali Ltd. is -- versus 13.60x for Harvest Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.13.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SBMSF or HZRGF?
Hazer Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Danakali Ltd.'s net margin of --. Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Hazer Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SBMSF or HZRGF?
Danakali Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hazer Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Danakali Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hazer Group Ltd., analysts believe Danakali Ltd. is more attractive than Hazer Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SBMSF or HZRGF More Risky?
Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.229% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hazer Group Ltd. has a beta of 77.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7620.487%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBMSF or HZRGF?
Danakali Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hazer Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Danakali Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hazer Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBMSF or HZRGF?
Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hazer Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Danakali Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hazer Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Danakali Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.38x while Hazer Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danakali Ltd. is -- versus 208.61x for Hazer Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.208.61x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SBMSF or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Danakali Ltd.'s net margin of --. Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SBMSF or NUFMF?
Danakali Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Danakali Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Danakali Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SBMSF or NUFMF More Risky?
Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.229% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SBMSF or NUFMF?
Danakali Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Danakali Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SBMSF or NUFMF?
Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Danakali Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Danakali Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 47.38x while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Danakali Ltd. is -- versus 0.26x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.26x 101.84x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
