HYSR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sunrun has a net margin of -- compared to SunHydrogen's net margin of -542.66%. SunHydrogen's return on equity of -- beat Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58%.

SunHydrogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunrun has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 123.51%. Given that Sunrun has higher upside potential than SunHydrogen, analysts believe Sunrun is more attractive than SunHydrogen.

SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, which suggesting that the stock is 269.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.088%.

SunHydrogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SunHydrogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SunHydrogen quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sunrun quarterly revenues of $518.5M. SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B. Notably, SunHydrogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SunHydrogen is -- versus 0.74x for Sunrun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SolarMax Technology has a net margin of -- compared to SunHydrogen's net margin of -151.98%. SunHydrogen's return on equity of -- beat SolarMax Technology's return on equity of --.

SunHydrogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SolarMax Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SunHydrogen has higher upside potential than SolarMax Technology, analysts believe SunHydrogen is more attractive than SolarMax Technology.

SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, which suggesting that the stock is 269.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SunHydrogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SolarMax Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SunHydrogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SolarMax Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SunHydrogen quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues of $6.3M. SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M is higher than SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, SunHydrogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SolarMax Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SunHydrogen is -- versus 1.95x for SolarMax Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectacular Solar has a net margin of -- compared to SunHydrogen's net margin of --. SunHydrogen's return on equity of -- beat Spectacular Solar's return on equity of --.

SunHydrogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Spectacular Solar has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SunHydrogen has higher upside potential than Spectacular Solar, analysts believe SunHydrogen is more attractive than Spectacular Solar.

SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, which suggesting that the stock is 269.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectacular Solar has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SunHydrogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectacular Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SunHydrogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectacular Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SunHydrogen quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Spectacular Solar quarterly revenues of --. SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Spectacular Solar's net income of --. Notably, SunHydrogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectacular Solar's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SunHydrogen is -- versus -- for Spectacular Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Solar Technology has a net margin of -- compared to SunHydrogen's net margin of --. SunHydrogen's return on equity of -- beat Universal Solar Technology's return on equity of --.

SunHydrogen has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Solar Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SunHydrogen has higher upside potential than Universal Solar Technology, analysts believe SunHydrogen is more attractive than Universal Solar Technology.

SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, which suggesting that the stock is 269.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Solar Technology has a beta of 13.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1222.577%.

SunHydrogen has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Solar Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SunHydrogen pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Solar Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SunHydrogen quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Universal Solar Technology quarterly revenues of --. SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Universal Solar Technology's net income of --. Notably, SunHydrogen's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Universal Solar Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SunHydrogen is -- versus -- for Universal Solar Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.