SMXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

SunHydrogen has a net margin of -151.98% compared to SolarMax Technology's net margin of --. SolarMax Technology's return on equity of -- beat SunHydrogen's return on equity of --.

SolarMax Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SunHydrogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SolarMax Technology has higher upside potential than SunHydrogen, analysts believe SolarMax Technology is more attractive than SunHydrogen.

SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 269.533%.

SolarMax Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SunHydrogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SolarMax Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SunHydrogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are larger than SunHydrogen quarterly revenues of --. SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M is lower than SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, SolarMax Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SunHydrogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SolarMax Technology is 1.95x versus -- for SunHydrogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunnova Energy International has a net margin of -151.98% compared to SolarMax Technology's net margin of -63.49%. SolarMax Technology's return on equity of -- beat Sunnova Energy International's return on equity of -14.72%.

SolarMax Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunnova Energy International has an analysts' consensus of $2.18 which suggests that it could grow by 431.03%. Given that Sunnova Energy International has higher upside potential than SolarMax Technology, analysts believe Sunnova Energy International is more attractive than SolarMax Technology.

SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunnova Energy International has a beta of 2.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.906%.

SolarMax Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunnova Energy International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SolarMax Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunnova Energy International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Sunnova Energy International quarterly revenues of $224.1M. SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M is higher than Sunnova Energy International's net income of -$142.3M. Notably, SolarMax Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunnova Energy International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SolarMax Technology is 1.95x versus 0.06x for Sunnova Energy International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunrun has a net margin of -151.98% compared to SolarMax Technology's net margin of -542.66%. SolarMax Technology's return on equity of -- beat Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58%.

SolarMax Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunrun has an analysts' consensus of $14.73 which suggests that it could grow by 123.51%. Given that Sunrun has higher upside potential than SolarMax Technology, analysts believe Sunrun is more attractive than SolarMax Technology.

SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 184.088%.

SolarMax Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SolarMax Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are smaller than Sunrun quarterly revenues of $518.5M. SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M is higher than Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B. Notably, SolarMax Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SolarMax Technology is 1.95x versus 0.74x for Sunrun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Solar Technology has a net margin of -151.98% compared to SolarMax Technology's net margin of --. SolarMax Technology's return on equity of -- beat Universal Solar Technology's return on equity of --.

SolarMax Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Universal Solar Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SolarMax Technology has higher upside potential than Universal Solar Technology, analysts believe SolarMax Technology is more attractive than Universal Solar Technology.

SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Solar Technology has a beta of 13.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1222.577%.

SolarMax Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Solar Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SolarMax Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Solar Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues are $6.3M, which are larger than Universal Solar Technology quarterly revenues of --. SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M is higher than Universal Solar Technology's net income of --. Notably, SolarMax Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Universal Solar Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SolarMax Technology is 1.95x versus -- for Universal Solar Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.