RUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enphase Energy has a net margin of -542.66% compared to Sunrun's net margin of 16.24%. Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58% beat Enphase Energy's return on equity of 11.27%.

Sunrun has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 119.51%. On the other hand Enphase Energy has an analysts' consensus of $79.96 which suggests that it could grow by 29.62%. Given that Sunrun has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe Sunrun is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, which suggesting that the stock is 184.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enphase Energy has a beta of 2.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.154%.

Sunrun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enphase Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enphase Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrun quarterly revenues are $518.5M, which are larger than Enphase Energy quarterly revenues of $382.7M. Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B is lower than Enphase Energy's net income of $62.2M. Notably, Sunrun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enphase Energy's PE ratio is 83.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrun is 0.76x versus 6.53x for Enphase Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SunHydrogen has a net margin of -542.66% compared to Sunrun's net margin of --. Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58% beat SunHydrogen's return on equity of --.

Sunrun has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 119.51%. On the other hand SunHydrogen has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sunrun has higher upside potential than SunHydrogen, analysts believe Sunrun is more attractive than SunHydrogen.

Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, which suggesting that the stock is 184.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SunHydrogen has a beta of 3.695, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 269.533%.

Sunrun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SunHydrogen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SunHydrogen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrun quarterly revenues are $518.5M, which are larger than SunHydrogen quarterly revenues of --. Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B is lower than SunHydrogen's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Sunrun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SunHydrogen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrun is 0.76x versus -- for SunHydrogen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunnova Energy International has a net margin of -542.66% compared to Sunrun's net margin of -63.49%. Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58% beat Sunnova Energy International's return on equity of -14.72%.

Sunrun has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 119.51%. On the other hand Sunnova Energy International has an analysts' consensus of $2.18 which suggests that it could grow by 310.8%. Given that Sunnova Energy International has higher upside potential than Sunrun, analysts believe Sunnova Energy International is more attractive than Sunrun.

Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, which suggesting that the stock is 184.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunnova Energy International has a beta of 2.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.906%.

Sunrun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunnova Energy International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunnova Energy International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrun quarterly revenues are $518.5M, which are larger than Sunnova Energy International quarterly revenues of $224.1M. Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B is lower than Sunnova Energy International's net income of -$142.3M. Notably, Sunrun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunnova Energy International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrun is 0.76x versus 0.08x for Sunnova Energy International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SolarMax Technology has a net margin of -542.66% compared to Sunrun's net margin of -151.98%. Sunrun's return on equity of -44.58% beat SolarMax Technology's return on equity of --.

Sunrun has a consensus price target of $14.73, signalling upside risk potential of 119.51%. On the other hand SolarMax Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sunrun has higher upside potential than SolarMax Technology, analysts believe Sunrun is more attractive than SolarMax Technology.

Sunrun has a beta of 2.841, which suggesting that the stock is 184.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SolarMax Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sunrun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SolarMax Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrun pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SolarMax Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrun quarterly revenues are $518.5M, which are larger than SolarMax Technology quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Sunrun's net income of -$2.8B is lower than SolarMax Technology's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Sunrun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SolarMax Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrun is 0.76x versus 1.78x for SolarMax Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.