ENPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Solar has a net margin of 12.02% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 35.26%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 6.48% beat First Solar's return on equity of 17.96%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $95.62, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand First Solar has an analysts' consensus of $270.40 which suggests that it could grow by 48.22%. Given that First Solar has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe First Solar is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.691, which suggesting that the stock is 69.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Solar has a beta of 1.460, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.044%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Solar offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Solar pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are smaller than First Solar quarterly revenues of $887.7M. Enphase Energy's net income of $45.8M is lower than First Solar's net income of $313M. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 162.39x while First Solar's PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 7.86x versus 5.09x for First Solar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 12.02% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 55.04%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 6.48% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $95.62, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 28.29%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.691, which suggesting that the stock is 69.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Enphase Energy's net income of $45.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 162.39x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 7.86x versus 29.57x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NEXTracker has a net margin of 12.02% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of 18.16%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 6.48% beat NEXTracker's return on equity of 49.99%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $95.62, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand NEXTracker has an analysts' consensus of $53.37 which suggests that it could grow by 51.85%. Given that NEXTracker has higher upside potential than Enphase Energy, analysts believe NEXTracker is more attractive than Enphase Energy.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.691, which suggesting that the stock is 69.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEXTracker has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NEXTracker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NEXTracker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are smaller than NEXTracker quarterly revenues of $635.6M. Enphase Energy's net income of $45.8M is lower than NEXTracker's net income of $115.4M. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 162.39x while NEXTracker's PE ratio is 9.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 7.86x versus 1.86x for NEXTracker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SolarEdge Technologies has a net margin of 12.02% compared to Enphase Energy's net margin of -461.98%. Enphase Energy's return on equity of 6.48% beat SolarEdge Technologies's return on equity of -81.13%.

Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $95.62, signalling upside risk potential of 33.83%. On the other hand SolarEdge Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 21.21%. Given that Enphase Energy has higher upside potential than SolarEdge Technologies, analysts believe Enphase Energy is more attractive than SolarEdge Technologies.

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.691, which suggesting that the stock is 69.121% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SolarEdge Technologies has a beta of 1.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.873%.

Enphase Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SolarEdge Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enphase Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SolarEdge Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enphase Energy quarterly revenues are $380.9M, which are larger than SolarEdge Technologies quarterly revenues of $260.9M. Enphase Energy's net income of $45.8M is higher than SolarEdge Technologies's net income of -$1.2B. Notably, Enphase Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 162.39x while SolarEdge Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enphase Energy is 7.86x versus 0.80x for SolarEdge Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.