Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
36
HLPPY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.43
Seasonality move
:
2.11%
Day range:
$5.43 - $5.68
52-week range:
$3.51 - $6.52
Dividend yield:
6.33%
P/E ratio:
22.24x
P/S ratio:
4.04x
P/B ratio:
0.30x
Volume:
5.4K
Avg. volume:
1.8K
1-year change:
24.33%
Market cap:
$5.3B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPPY
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPPY
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
|
$5.43 | -- | $5.3B | 22.24x | $0.08 | 6.33% | 4.04x |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
$7.57 | -- | $16.5B | 9.36x | $0.16 | 4.67% | 0.70x |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$3.06 | -- | $4.4B | 36.87x | $0.05 | 5.67% | 1.71x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.26 | -- | $1B | 32.58x | $0.00 | 5.05% | 0.15x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$16.83 | -- | $47.6B | 16.86x | $0.13 | 2.95% | 4.07x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.70x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.62x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPPY
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
|
29.15% | 2.189 | -- | 0.64x |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
40.3% | 1.144 | -- | 0.47x |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | 1.428 | -- | 0.61x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
67.32% | 0.087 | -- | 0.52x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 1.231 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.823 | -- | 0.58x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLPPY
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.02% | 1.42% | -- | -- |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.47% | 5.72% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.16% | 0.4% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPPY or CAOVY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.42% beat China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.-- -- $25.2B CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPPY or CAOVY?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd., analysts believe Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is more attractive than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.0 0 0 CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLPPY or CAOVY More Risky?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.501%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPPY or CAOVY?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Hang Lung Properties Ltd. pays 101.46% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays out 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPPY or CAOVY?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is 4.04x versus 0.70x for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.4.04x 22.24x -- -- CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.70x 9.36x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPPY or KRYPF?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.42% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.-- -- $25.2B KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPPY or KRYPF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLPPY or KRYPF More Risky?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.651%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPPY or KRYPF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hang Lung Properties Ltd. pays 101.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 208.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPPY or KRYPF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 36.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is 4.04x versus 1.71x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.4.04x 22.24x -- -- KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.1.71x 36.87x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPPY or PHKIF?
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.42% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.-- -- $25.2B PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $16B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPPY or PHKIF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.0 0 0 PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLPPY or PHKIF More Risky?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPPY or PHKIF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hang Lung Properties Ltd. pays 101.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPPY or PHKIF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 32.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is 4.04x versus 0.15x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.4.04x 22.24x -- -- PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0.15x 32.58x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPPY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.42% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.-- -- $25.2B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPPY or SUHJY?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLPPY or SUHJY More Risky?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.796%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPPY or SUHJY?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Hang Lung Properties Ltd. pays 101.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPPY or SUHJY?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is 4.04x versus 4.07x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.4.04x 22.24x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLPPY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.42% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.-- -- $25.2B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLPPY or TIACF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLPPY or TIACF More Risky?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.154, which suggesting that the stock is 84.552% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLPPY or TIACF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.33%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hang Lung Properties Ltd. pays 101.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 16.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLPPY or TIACF?
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hang Lung Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.24x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hang Lung Properties Ltd. is 4.04x versus 0.62x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLPPYHang Lung Properties Ltd.4.04x 22.24x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.62x 3.70x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
