Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
30
HKXCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$53.40
Seasonality move
:
6.52%
Day range:
$50.91 - $53.86
52-week range:
$35.14 - $60.59
Dividend yield:
2.75%
P/E ratio:
32.66x
P/S ratio:
20.85x
P/B ratio:
9.26x
Volume:
5K
Avg. volume:
4.7K
1-year change:
40.11%
Market cap:
$64.4B
Revenue:
$2.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.56
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$713.9M | $2.64 | 27.59% | 84.08% | $227.55 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
$50.94 | -- | $64.4B | 32.66x | $0.77 | 2.75% | 20.85x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
$5.89 | -- | $14M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.98x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$171.30 | $227.55 | $23.8B | 19.14x | $2.00 | 0% | 9.01x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
$2.84 | -- | $112.2M | 8.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.44x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
$1.30 | -- | $5.3M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 5.04x |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
$1.45 | -- | $177.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 10.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
2.32% | 0.993 | 0.22% | 0.88x |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | 7.539 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
27.22% | 2.239 | 7.22% | 0.07x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
22.88% | 1.656 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | 2.420 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
18.45% | 5.720 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
$906.5M | $747.3M | 31.05% | 31.95% | 75.16% | -- |
|
ABTS
Abits Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -63.52% | -63.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings Ltd.
|
$782.8M | $563.4M | 24% | 31.29% | 68.38% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or ABTS?
Abits Group, Inc. has a net margin of 63.2% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.95% beat Abits Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -63.52%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.91.18% $0.49 $7.2B ABTSAbits Group, Inc.-- -- $11.3M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or ABTS?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abits Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than Abits Group, Inc., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than Abits Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 ABTSAbits Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or ABTS More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abits Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.807, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 180.687%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or ABTS?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Abits Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Abits Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or ABTS?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $994.2M, which are larger than Abits Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $628.3M is higher than Abits Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while Abits Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 20.85x versus 1.98x for Abits Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.20.85x 32.66x $994.2M $628.3M ABTSAbits Group, Inc.1.98x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or FUTU?
Futu Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 63.2% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of 50.25%. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.95% beat Futu Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.91.18% $0.49 $7.2B FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.95.01% $2.94 $6.5B -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or FUTU?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $227.55 which suggests that it could grow by 31.68%. Given that Futu Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd., analysts believe Futu Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.13 1 0 -
Is HKXCF or FUTU More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.272%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or FUTU?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Futu Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or FUTU?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $994.2M, which are larger than Futu Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $824M. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $628.3M is higher than Futu Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $414M. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while Futu Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 20.85x versus 9.01x for Futu Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.20.85x 32.66x $994.2M $628.3M FUTUFutu Holdings Ltd.9.01x 19.14x $824M $414M
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a net margin of 63.2% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.95% beat Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.91.18% $0.49 $7.2B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or MATH?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or MATH More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. has a beta of -0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 197.426%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or MATH?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or MATH?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $994.2M, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $628.3M is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 20.85x versus 2.44x for Metalpha Technology Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.20.85x 32.66x $994.2M $628.3M MATHMetalpha Technology Holding Ltd.2.44x 8.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a net margin of 63.2% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.95% beat Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.91.18% $0.49 $7.2B MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or MEGL?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global Ltd., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than Magic Empire Global Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or MEGL More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or MEGL?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Magic Empire Global Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or MEGL?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $994.2M, which are larger than Magic Empire Global Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $628.3M is higher than Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while Magic Empire Global Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 20.85x versus 5.04x for Magic Empire Global Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.20.85x 32.66x $994.2M $628.3M MEGLMagic Empire Global Ltd.5.04x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or TROO?
TROOPS, Inc. has a net margin of 63.2% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 31.95% beat TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.91.18% $0.49 $7.2B TROOTROOPS, Inc.-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or TROO?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than TROOPS, Inc., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than TROOPS, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 TROOTROOPS, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or TROO More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.551, which suggesting that the stock is 44.922% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 3.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 205.095%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or TROO?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. TROOPS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.73% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or TROO?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $994.2M, which are larger than TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $628.3M is higher than TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 32.66x while TROOPS, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 20.85x versus 10.45x for TROOPS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.20.85x 32.66x $994.2M $628.3M TROOTROOPS, Inc.10.45x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 65.66% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.94% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 4.41% over the past day.
