Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
45
HKXCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$49.25
Seasonality move
:
7.4%
Day range:
$48.77 - $50.40
52-week range:
$36.30 - $60.59
Dividend yield:
3.33%
P/E ratio:
30.49x
P/S ratio:
19.52x
P/B ratio:
8.33x
Volume:
2.6K
Avg. volume:
4.3K
1-year change:
7.98%
Market cap:
$60.8B
Revenue:
$3.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.62
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CEVIY
China Everbright Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
$49.25 | -- | $60.8B | 30.49x | $0.83 | 3.33% | 19.52x |
|
CEVIY
China Everbright Ltd.
|
$5.40 | -- | $910M | -- | $0.06 | 2.37% | 2.66x |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
$1.39 | -- | $628.4M | 6.37x | $0.02 | 1.1% | 12.08x |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
$0.0059 | -- | $1.7M | -- | $0.00 | 6537.29% | 3.89x |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
$0.0001 | -- | $29.7K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
$0.29 | -- | $532M | 6.21x | $0.00 | 0.44% | 3.24x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
2.1% | 1.419 | 0.25% | 0.81x |
|
CEVIY
China Everbright Ltd.
|
50.36% | -0.732 | -- | 3.87x |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | 3.357 | -- | 16.97x |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-22.01% | 95.048 | -- | 0.21x |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -0.337 | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
1.82% | -0.134 | -- | 6.34x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HKXCF
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
|
$841.3M | $673.2M | 31.27% | 32.09% | 71.63% | -- |
|
CEVIY
China Everbright Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -2.81% | -5.51% | -- | -- |
|
GGPXF
G-Resources Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.42% | 3.42% | -- | -- |
|
RPGLF
Regent Pacific Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -708.06% | -803.55% | -- | -- |
|
TLGN
Ever Harvest International Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VPGLF
Value Partners Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.86% | 0.88% | -- | -- |
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or CEVIY?
China Everbright Ltd. has a net margin of 59.66% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.09% beat China Everbright Ltd.'s return on equity of -5.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.89.51% $0.44 $7.7B CEVIYChina Everbright Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or CEVIY?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Everbright Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Everbright Ltd., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than China Everbright Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 CEVIYChina Everbright Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or CEVIY More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 40.987% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Everbright Ltd. has a beta of 0.136, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.378%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or CEVIY?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. China Everbright Ltd. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.13% of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Ltd. pays out 13.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or CEVIY?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $939.9M, which are larger than China Everbright Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $560.7M is higher than China Everbright Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.49x while China Everbright Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 19.52x versus 2.66x for China Everbright Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.19.52x 30.49x $939.9M $560.7M CEVIYChina Everbright Ltd.2.66x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or GGPXF?
G-Resources Group Ltd. has a net margin of 59.66% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.09% beat G-Resources Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.89.51% $0.44 $7.7B GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.-- -- $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or GGPXF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand G-Resources Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than G-Resources Group Ltd., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than G-Resources Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or GGPXF More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 40.987% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-Resources Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.8%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or GGPXF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. G-Resources Group Ltd. offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.13% of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd. pays out 10.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or GGPXF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $939.9M, which are larger than G-Resources Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $560.7M is higher than G-Resources Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.49x while G-Resources Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 19.52x versus 12.08x for G-Resources Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.19.52x 30.49x $939.9M $560.7M GGPXFG-Resources Group Ltd.12.08x 6.37x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or RPGLF?
Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a net margin of 59.66% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.09% beat Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.89.51% $0.44 $7.7B RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.-- -- -$3.3M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or RPGLF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than Regent Pacific Group Ltd., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than Regent Pacific Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or RPGLF More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 40.987% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -14.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1552.047%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or RPGLF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. offers a yield of 6537.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or RPGLF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $939.9M, which are larger than Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $560.7M is higher than Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.49x while Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 19.52x versus 3.89x for Regent Pacific Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.19.52x 30.49x $939.9M $560.7M RPGLFRegent Pacific Group Ltd.3.89x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or TLGN?
Ever Harvest International Group has a net margin of 59.66% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.09% beat Ever Harvest International Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.89.51% $0.44 $7.7B TLGNEver Harvest International Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or TLGN?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ever Harvest International Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ever Harvest International Group, analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than Ever Harvest International Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 TLGNEver Harvest International Group0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or TLGN More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 40.987% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ever Harvest International Group has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.651%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or TLGN?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Ever Harvest International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Ever Harvest International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or TLGN?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $939.9M, which are larger than Ever Harvest International Group quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $560.7M is higher than Ever Harvest International Group's net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.49x while Ever Harvest International Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 19.52x versus 0.05x for Ever Harvest International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.19.52x 30.49x $939.9M $560.7M TLGNEver Harvest International Group0.05x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HKXCF or VPGLF?
Value Partners Group Ltd. has a net margin of 59.66% compared to Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net margin of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s return on equity of 32.09% beat Value Partners Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.89.51% $0.44 $7.7B VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.-- -- $467M -
What do Analysts Say About HKXCF or VPGLF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Value Partners Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has higher upside potential than Value Partners Group Ltd., analysts believe Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is more attractive than Value Partners Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.0 0 0 VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HKXCF or VPGLF More Risky?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a beta of 0.590, which suggesting that the stock is 40.987% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Partners Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.627%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HKXCF or VPGLF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Value Partners Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. pays 89.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd. pays out 15.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HKXCF or VPGLF?
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. quarterly revenues are $939.9M, which are larger than Value Partners Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s net income of $560.7M is higher than Value Partners Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.49x while Value Partners Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. is 19.52x versus 3.24x for Value Partners Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HKXCFHong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.19.52x 30.49x $939.9M $560.7M VPGLFValue Partners Group Ltd.3.24x 6.21x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
