ABTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Abits Group's net margin of --. Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.

Abits Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Abits Group has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Abits Group is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.

Abits Group has a beta of 3.038, which suggesting that the stock is 203.772% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.417%.

Abits Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abits Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Abits Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Abits Group's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Abits Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abits Group is 0.82x versus 2.56x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to Abits Group's net margin of --. Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.

Abits Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Abits Group has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Abits Group is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.

Abits Group has a beta of 3.038, which suggesting that the stock is 203.772% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Abits Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Abits Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Abits Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Abits Group's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Abits Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abits Group is 0.82x versus 5.59x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Abits Group's net margin of --. Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.

Abits Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Abits Group has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Abits Group is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.

Abits Group has a beta of 3.038, which suggesting that the stock is 203.772% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Abits Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abits Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Abits Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Abits Group's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Abits Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abits Group is 0.82x versus 14.26x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TROOPS has a net margin of -- compared to Abits Group's net margin of --. Abits Group's return on equity of -63.52% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.

Abits Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Abits Group has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Abits Group is more attractive than TROOPS.

Abits Group has a beta of 3.038, which suggesting that the stock is 203.772% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.036%.

Abits Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abits Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Abits Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. Abits Group's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, Abits Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abits Group is 0.82x versus 6.09x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.