TROO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

G-Resources Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS, Inc.'s net margin of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38% beat G-Resources Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.42%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand G-Resources Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS, Inc. has higher upside potential than G-Resources Group Ltd., analysts believe TROOPS, Inc. is more attractive than G-Resources Group Ltd..

TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 2.940, which suggesting that the stock is 194.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison G-Resources Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.477, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.301%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. G-Resources Group Ltd. offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. TROOPS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd. pays out 14.59% of its earnings as a dividend. G-Resources Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than G-Resources Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than G-Resources Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, TROOPS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while G-Resources Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS, Inc. is 20.61x versus 10.49x for G-Resources Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS, Inc.'s net margin of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38% beat Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -803.55%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Regent Pacific Group Ltd., analysts believe TROOPS, Inc. is more attractive than Regent Pacific Group Ltd..

TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 2.940, which suggesting that the stock is 194.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regent Pacific Group Ltd. has a beta of -20.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2174.52%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regent Pacific Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Regent Pacific Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, TROOPS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Regent Pacific Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS, Inc. is 20.61x versus 31.49x for Regent Pacific Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ever Harvest International Group has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS, Inc.'s net margin of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38% beat Ever Harvest International Group's return on equity of --.

TROOPS, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ever Harvest International Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ever Harvest International Group, analysts believe TROOPS, Inc. is more attractive than Ever Harvest International Group.

TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 2.940, which suggesting that the stock is 194.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ever Harvest International Group has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.651%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ever Harvest International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ever Harvest International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ever Harvest International Group quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Ever Harvest International Group's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ever Harvest International Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS, Inc. is 20.61x versus 0.05x for Ever Harvest International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Value Partners Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS, Inc.'s net margin of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.38% beat Value Partners Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.88%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Value Partners Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS, Inc. has higher upside potential than Value Partners Group Ltd., analysts believe TROOPS, Inc. is more attractive than Value Partners Group Ltd..

TROOPS, Inc. has a beta of 2.940, which suggesting that the stock is 194.009% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Value Partners Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.028, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.761%.

TROOPS, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Value Partners Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd. pays out 58.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Value Partners Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TROOPS, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Value Partners Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Value Partners Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, TROOPS, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Value Partners Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS, Inc. is 20.61x versus 6.48x for Value Partners Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.