TROO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CLPS has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat CLPS's return on equity of -1.92%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CLPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than CLPS, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than CLPS.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.178, which suggesting that the stock is 117.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CLPS has a beta of 0.762, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.846%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CLPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CLPS pays out -109.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CLPS quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than CLPS's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CLPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 0.01x versus 0.18x for CLPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Infobird has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Infobird's return on equity of 2.83%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Infobird has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3512576.06%. Given that Infobird has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Infobird is more attractive than TROOPS.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.178, which suggesting that the stock is 117.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Infobird has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Infobird offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Infobird pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Infobird quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Infobird's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Infobird's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 0.01x versus 1.97x for Infobird. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MMTEC has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat MMTEC's return on equity of --.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MMTEC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than MMTEC, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than MMTEC.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.178, which suggesting that the stock is 117.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MMTEC has a beta of 0.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.814%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MMTEC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MMTEC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MMTEC quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than MMTEC's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MMTEC's PE ratio is 1.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 0.01x versus 22.20x for MMTEC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of 12.05%. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity of 11.76%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Silicon Motion Technology has an analysts' consensus of $73.67 which suggests that it could grow by 78.11%. Given that Silicon Motion Technology has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Silicon Motion Technology is more attractive than TROOPS.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.178, which suggesting that the stock is 117.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.197%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silicon Motion Technology offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silicon Motion Technology pays out 74.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Silicon Motion Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Silicon Motion Technology quarterly revenues of $191.2M. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Silicon Motion Technology's net income of $23M. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silicon Motion Technology's PE ratio is 15.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 0.01x versus 1.74x for Silicon Motion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.