Financhill
Sell
41

GUDHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$7.06
Seasonality move :
5.42%
Day range:
$7.06 - $7.06
52-week range:
$6.14 - $7.06
Dividend yield:
3.81%
P/E ratio:
15.42x
P/S ratio:
1.54x
P/B ratio:
1.59x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
14.92%
Market cap:
$994.2M
Revenue:
$647.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.46

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GUDHF
Amotiv
-- -- -- -- --
AAPI
Apple iSports Group
-- -- -- -- --
FTEL
Fitell
-- -- -- -- --
MMA
Mixed Martial Arts Group
-- -- -- -- --
WFAFY
Wesfarmers
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GUDHF
Amotiv
$7.06 -- $994.2M 15.42x $0.15 3.81% 1.54x
AAPI
Apple iSports Group
$6.00 -- $1.2B -- $0.00 0% --
FTEL
Fitell
$8.95 -- $180.1M -- $0.00 0% 28.09x
MMA
Mixed Martial Arts Group
$1.38 -- $14.5M -- $0.00 0% --
WFAFY
Wesfarmers
$22.38 -- $50.8B 29.97x $0.36 2.93% 1.76x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GUDHF
Amotiv
29.3% 0.107 29.9% 1.02x
AAPI
Apple iSports Group
-- -116.893 -- --
FTEL
Fitell
-- 9.710 -- 2.37x
MMA
Mixed Martial Arts Group
-- 0.000 -- --
WFAFY
Wesfarmers
35.65% 1.477 6.5% 0.37x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GUDHF
Amotiv
-- -- 7.12% 10.6% -- --
AAPI
Apple iSports Group
-- -$1.1M -- -- -- -$746.4K
FTEL
Fitell
-- -- -110.03% -110.03% -- --
MMA
Mixed Martial Arts Group
-- -- -- -- -- --
WFAFY
Wesfarmers
-- -- 16.39% 29.62% -- --

Amotiv vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GUDHF or AAPI?

    Apple iSports Group has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6% beat Apple iSports Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    -- -- $882.7M
    AAPI
    Apple iSports Group
    -- -$0.00 --
  • What do Analysts Say About GUDHF or AAPI?

    Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Apple iSports Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amotiv has higher upside potential than Apple iSports Group, analysts believe Amotiv is more attractive than Apple iSports Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    0 0 0
    AAPI
    Apple iSports Group
    0 0 0
  • Is GUDHF or AAPI More Risky?

    Amotiv has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apple iSports Group has a beta of -7.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 830.937%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUDHF or AAPI?

    Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Apple iSports Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Apple iSports Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GUDHF or AAPI?

    Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Apple iSports Group quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Apple iSports Group's net income of -$435.5K. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.42x while Apple iSports Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.54x versus -- for Apple iSports Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    1.54x 15.42x -- --
    AAPI
    Apple iSports Group
    -- -- -- -$435.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns GUDHF or FTEL?

    Fitell has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6% beat Fitell's return on equity of -110.03%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    -- -- $882.7M
    FTEL
    Fitell
    -- -- $9M
  • What do Analysts Say About GUDHF or FTEL?

    Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fitell has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amotiv has higher upside potential than Fitell, analysts believe Amotiv is more attractive than Fitell.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    0 0 0
    FTEL
    Fitell
    0 0 0
  • Is GUDHF or FTEL More Risky?

    Amotiv has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fitell has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUDHF or FTEL?

    Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Fitell offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Fitell pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GUDHF or FTEL?

    Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fitell quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Fitell's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.42x while Fitell's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.54x versus 28.09x for Fitell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    1.54x 15.42x -- --
    FTEL
    Fitell
    28.09x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GUDHF or MMA?

    Mixed Martial Arts Group has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6% beat Mixed Martial Arts Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    -- -- $882.7M
    MMA
    Mixed Martial Arts Group
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About GUDHF or MMA?

    Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mixed Martial Arts Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 407.08%. Given that Mixed Martial Arts Group has higher upside potential than Amotiv, analysts believe Mixed Martial Arts Group is more attractive than Amotiv.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    0 0 0
    MMA
    Mixed Martial Arts Group
    0 0 0
  • Is GUDHF or MMA More Risky?

    Amotiv has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mixed Martial Arts Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUDHF or MMA?

    Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Mixed Martial Arts Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Mixed Martial Arts Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GUDHF or MMA?

    Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mixed Martial Arts Group quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Mixed Martial Arts Group's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.42x while Mixed Martial Arts Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.54x versus -- for Mixed Martial Arts Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    1.54x 15.42x -- --
    MMA
    Mixed Martial Arts Group
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns GUDHF or WFAFY?

    Wesfarmers has a net margin of -- compared to Amotiv's net margin of --. Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6% beat Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    -- -- $882.7M
    WFAFY
    Wesfarmers
    -- -- $8.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About GUDHF or WFAFY?

    Amotiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wesfarmers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amotiv has higher upside potential than Wesfarmers, analysts believe Amotiv is more attractive than Wesfarmers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    0 0 0
    WFAFY
    Wesfarmers
    0 0 0
  • Is GUDHF or WFAFY More Risky?

    Amotiv has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.225%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GUDHF or WFAFY?

    Amotiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Wesfarmers offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Amotiv pays 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GUDHF or WFAFY?

    Amotiv quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wesfarmers quarterly revenues of --. Amotiv's net income of -- is lower than Wesfarmers's net income of --. Notably, Amotiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.42x while Wesfarmers's PE ratio is 29.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amotiv is 1.54x versus 1.76x for Wesfarmers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GUDHF
    Amotiv
    1.54x 15.42x -- --
    WFAFY
    Wesfarmers
    1.76x 29.97x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks

Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…

Will American Tower Stock Recover?
Will American Tower Stock Recover?

The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…

Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?

Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…

Stock Ideas

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7

Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.12% over the past day.

Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 6.02% over the past day.

Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7

Alico [ALCO] is down 0.67% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock