AAPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Galaxy Gaming, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s net margin of 14.19%. Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Galaxy Gaming, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Galaxy Gaming, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -60.11%. Given that Galaxy Gaming, Inc. has higher upside potential than Apple iSports Group, Inc., analysts believe Galaxy Gaming, Inc. is more attractive than Apple iSports Group, Inc..

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a beta of -10.898, which suggesting that the stock is 1189.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galaxy Gaming, Inc. has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.293%.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galaxy Gaming, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Gaming, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Galaxy Gaming, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.3M. Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is lower than Galaxy Gaming, Inc.'s net income of $1M. Notably, Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Galaxy Gaming, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group, Inc. is -- versus 1.61x for Galaxy Gaming, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Good Gaming, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s net margin of -102453.45%. Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Good Gaming, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Good Gaming, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Apple iSports Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Good Gaming, Inc., analysts believe Apple iSports Group, Inc. is more attractive than Good Gaming, Inc..

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a beta of -10.898, which suggesting that the stock is 1189.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Good Gaming, Inc. has a beta of -1.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 237.206%.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Good Gaming, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Good Gaming, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Good Gaming, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is lower than Good Gaming, Inc.'s net income of -$50.7K. Notably, Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Good Gaming, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group, Inc. is -- versus 4,394.74x for Good Gaming, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Littlefield Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s net margin of --. Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Littlefield Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Littlefield Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 252.94%. Given that Littlefield Corp. has higher upside potential than Apple iSports Group, Inc., analysts believe Littlefield Corp. is more attractive than Apple iSports Group, Inc..

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a beta of -10.898, which suggesting that the stock is 1189.817% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Littlefield Corp. has a beta of 52.597, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5159.683%.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Littlefield Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Littlefield Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Littlefield Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.5M is higher than Littlefield Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Apple iSports Group, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Littlefield Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group, Inc. is -- versus 0.40x for Littlefield Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.