AAPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group's net margin of -26.81%. Apple iSports Group's return on equity of -- beat DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02%.

Apple iSports Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $51.19 which suggests that it could grow by 37.02%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Apple iSports Group, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Apple iSports Group.

Apple iSports Group has a beta of -7.309, which suggesting that the stock is 830.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.898, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.784%.

Apple iSports Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Apple iSports Group's net income of -$435.5K is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M. Notably, Apple iSports Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group is -- versus 3.95x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group's net margin of 4.36%. Apple iSports Group's return on equity of -- beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Apple iSports Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 54.82%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Apple iSports Group, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Apple iSports Group.

Apple iSports Group has a beta of -7.309, which suggesting that the stock is 830.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.445%.

Apple iSports Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $78M. Apple iSports Group's net income of -$435.5K is lower than Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Apple iSports Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 76.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group is -- versus 0.85x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group's net margin of 7.83%. Apple iSports Group's return on equity of -- beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6%.

Apple iSports Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $108.83 which suggests that it could grow by 27.09%. Given that Light & Wonder has higher upside potential than Apple iSports Group, analysts believe Light & Wonder is more attractive than Apple iSports Group.

Apple iSports Group has a beta of -7.309, which suggesting that the stock is 830.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.734, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.396%.

Apple iSports Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $817M. Apple iSports Group's net income of -$435.5K is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $64M. Notably, Apple iSports Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group is -- versus 2.49x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Apple iSports Group's net margin of -6.67%. Apple iSports Group's return on equity of -- beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Apple iSports Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Apple iSports Group has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Apple iSports Group is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Apple iSports Group has a beta of -7.309, which suggesting that the stock is 830.937% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Apple iSports Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Apple iSports Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Apple iSports Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Apple iSports Group's net income of -$435.5K is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Apple iSports Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apple iSports Group is -- versus 1.12x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.