FTEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aristocrat Leisure has a net margin of -- compared to Fitell's net margin of --. Fitell's return on equity of -110.03% beat Aristocrat Leisure's return on equity of 20.06%.

Fitell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aristocrat Leisure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fitell has higher upside potential than Aristocrat Leisure, analysts believe Fitell is more attractive than Aristocrat Leisure.

Fitell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aristocrat Leisure has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.395%.

Fitell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aristocrat Leisure offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Fitell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aristocrat Leisure pays out 34.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Aristocrat Leisure's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fitell quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aristocrat Leisure quarterly revenues of --. Fitell's net income of -- is lower than Aristocrat Leisure's net income of --. Notably, Fitell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aristocrat Leisure's PE ratio is 32.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fitell is 27.97x versus 6.50x for Aristocrat Leisure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amotiv has a net margin of -- compared to Fitell's net margin of --. Fitell's return on equity of -110.03% beat Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6%.

Fitell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amotiv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fitell has higher upside potential than Amotiv, analysts believe Fitell is more attractive than Amotiv.

Fitell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amotiv has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.558%.

Fitell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amotiv offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Fitell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fitell quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amotiv quarterly revenues of --. Fitell's net income of -- is lower than Amotiv's net income of --. Notably, Fitell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amotiv's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fitell is 27.97x versus 1.25x for Amotiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mixed Martial Arts Group has a net margin of -- compared to Fitell's net margin of --. Fitell's return on equity of -110.03% beat Mixed Martial Arts Group's return on equity of --.

Fitell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mixed Martial Arts Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 416.63%. Given that Mixed Martial Arts Group has higher upside potential than Fitell, analysts believe Mixed Martial Arts Group is more attractive than Fitell.

Fitell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mixed Martial Arts Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fitell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mixed Martial Arts Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fitell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mixed Martial Arts Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fitell quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mixed Martial Arts Group quarterly revenues of --. Fitell's net income of -- is lower than Mixed Martial Arts Group's net income of --. Notably, Fitell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mixed Martial Arts Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fitell is 27.97x versus -- for Mixed Martial Arts Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wesfarmers has a net margin of -- compared to Fitell's net margin of --. Fitell's return on equity of -110.03% beat Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62%.

Fitell has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wesfarmers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fitell has higher upside potential than Wesfarmers, analysts believe Fitell is more attractive than Wesfarmers.

Fitell has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.225%.

Fitell has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wesfarmers offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Fitell pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers pays out 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fitell quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wesfarmers quarterly revenues of --. Fitell's net income of -- is lower than Wesfarmers's net income of --. Notably, Fitell's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wesfarmers's PE ratio is 29.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fitell is 27.97x versus 1.76x for Wesfarmers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.