WFAFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aristocrat Leisure has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62% beat Aristocrat Leisure's return on equity of 20.06%.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aristocrat Leisure has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wesfarmers has higher upside potential than Aristocrat Leisure, analysts believe Wesfarmers is more attractive than Aristocrat Leisure.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aristocrat Leisure has a beta of 1.274, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.395%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Aristocrat Leisure offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Aristocrat Leisure pays out 34.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aristocrat Leisure quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Aristocrat Leisure's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.97x while Aristocrat Leisure's PE ratio is 32.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.74x versus 6.50x for Aristocrat Leisure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fitell has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62% beat Fitell's return on equity of -110.03%.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fitell has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wesfarmers has higher upside potential than Fitell, analysts believe Wesfarmers is more attractive than Fitell.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fitell has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Fitell offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fitell pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fitell quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Fitell's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.97x while Fitell's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.74x versus 27.97x for Fitell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amotiv has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62% beat Amotiv's return on equity of 10.6%.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amotiv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wesfarmers has higher upside potential than Amotiv, analysts believe Wesfarmers is more attractive than Amotiv.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amotiv has a beta of -0.046, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.558%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Amotiv offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Amotiv pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amotiv quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Amotiv's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.97x while Amotiv's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.74x versus 1.25x for Amotiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mixed Martial Arts Group has a net margin of -- compared to Wesfarmers's net margin of --. Wesfarmers's return on equity of 29.62% beat Mixed Martial Arts Group's return on equity of --.

Wesfarmers has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mixed Martial Arts Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 416.63%. Given that Mixed Martial Arts Group has higher upside potential than Wesfarmers, analysts believe Mixed Martial Arts Group is more attractive than Wesfarmers.

Wesfarmers has a beta of 1.292, which suggesting that the stock is 29.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mixed Martial Arts Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wesfarmers has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.96%. Mixed Martial Arts Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wesfarmers pays 86.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Mixed Martial Arts Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wesfarmers's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wesfarmers quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mixed Martial Arts Group quarterly revenues of --. Wesfarmers's net income of -- is lower than Mixed Martial Arts Group's net income of --. Notably, Wesfarmers's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.97x while Mixed Martial Arts Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wesfarmers is 1.74x versus -- for Mixed Martial Arts Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.