GFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CompX International, Inc. has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 10.57%. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -222.37% beat CompX International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.3%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CompX International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.68%. Given that CompX International, Inc. has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, Inc., analysts believe CompX International, Inc. is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings, Inc..

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CompX International, Inc. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.022%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CompX International, Inc. offers a yield of 5.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. GenFlat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CompX International, Inc. pays out 89.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CompX International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than CompX International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $40M. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$554.7K is lower than CompX International, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CompX International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings, Inc. is -- versus 1.69x for CompX International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Conair Corp. (New York) has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -222.37% beat Conair Corp. (New York)'s return on equity of --.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Conair Corp. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Conair Corp. (New York), analysts believe GenFlat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Conair Corp. (New York).

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conair Corp. (New York) has a beta of -0.146, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.601%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conair Corp. (New York) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GenFlat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conair Corp. (New York) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are larger than Conair Corp. (New York) quarterly revenues of --. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$554.7K is higher than Conair Corp. (New York)'s net income of --. Notably, GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Conair Corp. (New York)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings, Inc. is -- versus 0.30x for Conair Corp. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -222.37% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe GenFlat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.21%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. GenFlat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$554.7K is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings, Inc. is -- versus 0.40x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a net margin of -22345.34% compared to GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.11%. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -222.37% beat Energy Recovery, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.68%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Energy Recovery, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.40 which suggests that it could grow by 24.25%. Given that Energy Recovery, Inc. has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Energy Recovery, Inc. is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings, Inc..

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Recovery, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.987%.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Recovery, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GenFlat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Recovery, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.9K, which are smaller than Energy Recovery, Inc. quarterly revenues of $32M. GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$554.7K is lower than Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M. Notably, GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Recovery, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GenFlat Holdings, Inc. is -- versus 5.97x for Energy Recovery, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.