ERII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conair Corp. (New York) has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net margin of --. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.68% beat Conair Corp. (New York)'s return on equity of --.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.25%. On the other hand Conair Corp. (New York) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Recovery, Inc. has higher upside potential than Conair Corp. (New York), analysts believe Energy Recovery, Inc. is more attractive than Conair Corp. (New York).

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conair Corp. (New York) has a beta of -0.146, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.601%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conair Corp. (New York) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Recovery, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conair Corp. (New York) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Recovery, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than Conair Corp. (New York) quarterly revenues of --. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M is higher than Conair Corp. (New York)'s net income of --. Notably, Energy Recovery, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.14x while Conair Corp. (New York)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery, Inc. is 5.97x versus 0.30x for Conair Corp. (New York). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson Co., Inc. has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net margin of 11.66%. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.68% beat Donaldson Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 24.49%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.25%. On the other hand Donaldson Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $87.00 which suggests that it could fall by -8.88%. Given that Energy Recovery, Inc. has higher upside potential than Donaldson Co., Inc., analysts believe Energy Recovery, Inc. is more attractive than Donaldson Co., Inc..

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.07%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson Co., Inc. offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Energy Recovery, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson Co., Inc. pays out 37.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Recovery, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are smaller than Donaldson Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $935.4M. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M is lower than Donaldson Co., Inc.'s net income of $113.9M. Notably, Energy Recovery, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.14x while Donaldson Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 30.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery, Inc. is 5.97x versus 3.07x for Donaldson Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net margin of 4.05%. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.68% beat Fuel Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.21%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.25%. On the other hand Fuel Tech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 123.46%. Given that Fuel Tech, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, Inc., analysts believe Fuel Tech, Inc. is more attractive than Energy Recovery, Inc..

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.99%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Recovery, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Recovery, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than Fuel Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M is higher than Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net income of $303K. Notably, Energy Recovery, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.14x while Fuel Tech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery, Inc. is 5.97x versus 2.24x for Fuel Tech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 12.11% compared to Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net margin of -22345.34%. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.68% beat GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -222.37%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a consensus price target of $17.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.25%. On the other hand GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Recovery, Inc. has higher upside potential than GenFlat Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Energy Recovery, Inc. is more attractive than GenFlat Holdings, Inc..

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 12.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GenFlat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GenFlat Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Recovery, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GenFlat Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Recovery, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32M, which are larger than GenFlat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.9K. Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M is higher than GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$554.7K. Notably, Energy Recovery, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 43.14x while GenFlat Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Recovery, Inc. is 5.97x versus -- for GenFlat Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.