FTEK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental Corp. has a net margin of 4.05% compared to Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net margin of 0.92%. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.21% beat CECO Environmental Corp.'s return on equity of 18.94%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 118.58%. On the other hand CECO Environmental Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $58.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.95%. Given that Fuel Tech, Inc. has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental Corp., analysts believe Fuel Tech, Inc. is more attractive than CECO Environmental Corp..

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental Corp. has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.759%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental Corp. quarterly revenues of $197.6M. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net income of $303K is lower than CECO Environmental Corp.'s net income of $1.8M. Notably, Fuel Tech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental Corp.'s PE ratio is 38.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech, Inc. is 2.29x versus 2.77x for CECO Environmental Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson Co., Inc. has a net margin of 4.05% compared to Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net margin of 11.66%. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.21% beat Donaldson Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 24.49%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 118.58%. On the other hand Donaldson Co., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $85.80 which suggests that it could fall by -2.06%. Given that Fuel Tech, Inc. has higher upside potential than Donaldson Co., Inc., analysts believe Fuel Tech, Inc. is more attractive than Donaldson Co., Inc..

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.07%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson Co., Inc. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Fuel Tech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson Co., Inc. pays out 37.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fuel Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Donaldson Co., Inc. quarterly revenues of $980.7M. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net income of $303K is lower than Donaldson Co., Inc.'s net income of $114.3M. Notably, Fuel Tech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson Co., Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech, Inc. is 2.29x versus 2.86x for Donaldson Co., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Recovery, Inc. has a net margin of 4.05% compared to Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net margin of 12.11%. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.21% beat Energy Recovery, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.68%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 118.58%. On the other hand Energy Recovery, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.40 which suggests that it could grow by 22.42%. Given that Fuel Tech, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy Recovery, Inc., analysts believe Fuel Tech, Inc. is more attractive than Energy Recovery, Inc..

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Recovery, Inc. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.987%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Recovery, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Recovery, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Energy Recovery, Inc. quarterly revenues of $32M. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net income of $303K is lower than Energy Recovery, Inc.'s net income of $3.9M. Notably, Fuel Tech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Energy Recovery, Inc.'s PE ratio is 43.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech, Inc. is 2.29x versus 6.06x for Energy Recovery, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 4.05% compared to Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net margin of --. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.21% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 118.58%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14416.13%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, Inc., analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Fuel Tech, Inc..

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.99% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.868, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.772%.

Fuel Tech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Fuel Tech, Inc.'s net income of $303K is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Fuel Tech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech, Inc. is 2.29x versus 26.31x for Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.