Financhill
Buy
66

GBNXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$18.79
Seasonality move :
-0.55%
Day range:
$18.79 - $18.79
52-week range:
$13.94 - $19.61
Dividend yield:
6.45%
P/E ratio:
28.74x
P/S ratio:
0.40x
P/B ratio:
4.93x
Volume:
9K
Avg. volume:
25.4K
1-year change:
11.01%
Market cap:
$3.1B
Revenue:
$8.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.65

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GBNXF
Gibson Energy, Inc.
-- -- 27.44% -- --
FRO
Frontline Plc
$269M $0.24 6.81% 276.78% $29.38
GEL
Genesis Energy LP
-- -- -- -- $19.33
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
-- -- -- -- --
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
$52.9M $0.03 -3.04% 1512.9% $4.25
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
$12.6B $0.40 6.83% 137.61% $20.81
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GBNXF
Gibson Energy, Inc.
$18.79 -- $3.1B 28.74x $0.31 6.45% 0.40x
FRO
Frontline Plc
$21.43 $29.38 $4.8B 21.90x $0.19 4.34% 2.70x
GEL
Genesis Energy LP
$15.62 $19.33 $1.9B 34.62x $0.17 4.23% 1.00x
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
$4.46 -- $8.9M 14.27x $0.05 6.85% 9.24x
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
$3.39 $4.25 $717.8M 372.53x $0.13 10.62% 2.55x
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
$18.88 $20.81 $3.7B 21.55x $0.38 2.01% 0.08x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GBNXF
Gibson Energy, Inc.
75.86% 0.204 66.24% 0.77x
FRO
Frontline Plc
58.21% 1.484 63.86% 0.44x
GEL
Genesis Energy LP
92.44% -0.090 101.41% 0.87x
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
-- 0.843 -- --
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
48.43% 0.797 65.13% 1.24x
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
87.75% 0.670 58.72% 0.90x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GBNXF
Gibson Energy, Inc.
$80.4M $66.3M 4.19% 16.48% 3.17% $86.4M
FRO
Frontline Plc
$105.3M $90M 3.66% 9.31% 20.8% $104.4M
GEL
Genesis Energy LP
$93.9M $79M -0.97% -4.27% 19.07% $48.7M
MARPS
Marine Petroleum Trust
-- $130.8K 66.46% 66.46% 58.55% --
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
$13.8M $6.8M 0.23% 0.39% 9.05% $3.9M
PAGP
Plains GP Holdings LP
$462M $378M 5.43% 8.75% 3.27% $632M

Gibson Energy, Inc. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GBNXF or FRO?

    Frontline Plc has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 9.32%. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Frontline Plc's return on equity of 9.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    3.85% $0.20 $2.6B
    FRO
    Frontline Plc
    24.34% $0.18 $5.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About GBNXF or FRO?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Frontline Plc has an analysts' consensus of $29.38 which suggests that it could grow by 37.07%. Given that Frontline Plc has higher upside potential than Gibson Energy, Inc., analysts believe Frontline Plc is more attractive than Gibson Energy, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0 0 0
    FRO
    Frontline Plc
    3 0 0
  • Is GBNXF or FRO More Risky?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frontline Plc has a beta of 0.058, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.153%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBNXF or FRO?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.45%. Frontline Plc offers a yield of 4.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Gibson Energy, Inc. pays 175.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Frontline Plc pays out 87.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Frontline Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Gibson Energy, Inc.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GBNXF or FRO?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Frontline Plc quarterly revenues of $432.7M. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M is lower than Frontline Plc's net income of $40.3M. Notably, Gibson Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.74x while Frontline Plc's PE ratio is 21.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gibson Energy, Inc. is 0.40x versus 2.70x for Frontline Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0.40x 28.74x $2.1B $33.2M
    FRO
    Frontline Plc
    2.70x 21.90x $432.7M $40.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns GBNXF or GEL?

    Genesis Energy LP has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 5.5%. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Genesis Energy LP's return on equity of -4.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    3.85% $0.20 $2.6B
    GEL
    Genesis Energy LP
    22.69% -$0.05 $3.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About GBNXF or GEL?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genesis Energy LP has an analysts' consensus of $19.33 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that Genesis Energy LP has higher upside potential than Gibson Energy, Inc., analysts believe Genesis Energy LP is more attractive than Gibson Energy, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0 0 0
    GEL
    Genesis Energy LP
    2 0 0
  • Is GBNXF or GEL More Risky?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genesis Energy LP has a beta of 0.818, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.188%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBNXF or GEL?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.45%. Genesis Energy LP offers a yield of 4.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Gibson Energy, Inc. pays 175.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Genesis Energy LP pays out 493.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GBNXF or GEL?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Genesis Energy LP quarterly revenues of $414M. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M is higher than Genesis Energy LP's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Gibson Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.74x while Genesis Energy LP's PE ratio is 34.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gibson Energy, Inc. is 0.40x versus 1.00x for Genesis Energy LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0.40x 28.74x $2.1B $33.2M
    GEL
    Genesis Energy LP
    1.00x 34.62x $414M $22.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns GBNXF or MARPS?

    Marine Petroleum Trust has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 58.55%. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Marine Petroleum Trust's return on equity of 66.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    3.85% $0.20 $2.6B
    MARPS
    Marine Petroleum Trust
    -- $0.07 $916.1K
  • What do Analysts Say About GBNXF or MARPS?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marine Petroleum Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gibson Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Marine Petroleum Trust, analysts believe Gibson Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Marine Petroleum Trust.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0 0 0
    MARPS
    Marine Petroleum Trust
    0 0 0
  • Is GBNXF or MARPS More Risky?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marine Petroleum Trust has a beta of 0.269, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.114%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBNXF or MARPS?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.45%. Marine Petroleum Trust offers a yield of 6.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Gibson Energy, Inc. pays 175.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Marine Petroleum Trust pays out 106% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GBNXF or MARPS?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Marine Petroleum Trust quarterly revenues of $223.4K. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M is higher than Marine Petroleum Trust's net income of $130.8K. Notably, Gibson Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.74x while Marine Petroleum Trust's PE ratio is 14.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gibson Energy, Inc. is 0.40x versus 9.24x for Marine Petroleum Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0.40x 28.74x $2.1B $33.2M
    MARPS
    Marine Petroleum Trust
    9.24x 14.27x $223.4K $130.8K
  • Which has Higher Returns GBNXF or NAT?

    Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -3.71%. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.39%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    3.85% $0.20 $2.6B
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
    18.43% -$0.01 $894.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About GBNXF or NAT?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 25.37%. Given that Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has higher upside potential than Gibson Energy, Inc., analysts believe Nordic American Tankers Ltd. is more attractive than Gibson Energy, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0 0 0
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
    1 1 0
  • Is GBNXF or NAT More Risky?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordic American Tankers Ltd. has a beta of -0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.394%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBNXF or NAT?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.45%. Nordic American Tankers Ltd. offers a yield of 10.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Gibson Energy, Inc. pays 175.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordic American Tankers Ltd. pays out 180.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GBNXF or NAT?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Nordic American Tankers Ltd. quarterly revenues of $75M. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M is higher than Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Gibson Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.74x while Nordic American Tankers Ltd.'s PE ratio is 372.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gibson Energy, Inc. is 0.40x versus 2.55x for Nordic American Tankers Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0.40x 28.74x $2.1B $33.2M
    NAT
    Nordic American Tankers Ltd.
    2.55x 372.53x $75M -$2.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns GBNXF or PAGP?

    Plains GP Holdings LP has a net margin of 1.59% compared to Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 3.7%. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.48% beat Plains GP Holdings LP's return on equity of 8.75%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    3.85% $0.20 $2.6B
    PAGP
    Plains GP Holdings LP
    4% $0.36 $23.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About GBNXF or PAGP?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Plains GP Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of $20.81 which suggests that it could grow by 10.21%. Given that Plains GP Holdings LP has higher upside potential than Gibson Energy, Inc., analysts believe Plains GP Holdings LP is more attractive than Gibson Energy, Inc..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0 0 0
    PAGP
    Plains GP Holdings LP
    6 6 1
  • Is GBNXF or PAGP More Risky?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.748, which suggesting that the stock is 25.182% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plains GP Holdings LP has a beta of 0.572, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.842%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GBNXF or PAGP?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.45%. Plains GP Holdings LP offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Gibson Energy, Inc. pays 175.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Plains GP Holdings LP pays out 242.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GBNXF or PAGP?

    Gibson Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Plains GP Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Gibson Energy, Inc.'s net income of $33.2M is lower than Plains GP Holdings LP's net income of $428M. Notably, Gibson Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.74x while Plains GP Holdings LP's PE ratio is 21.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gibson Energy, Inc. is 0.40x versus 0.08x for Plains GP Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GBNXF
    Gibson Energy, Inc.
    0.40x 28.74x $2.1B $33.2M
    PAGP
    Plains GP Holdings LP
    0.08x 21.55x $11.6B $428M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25

Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.

Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock