FJTNY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 5.59% compared to FUJI Media Holdings's net margin of 5.53%. FUJI Media Holdings's return on equity of 4.26% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 15.18%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJI Media Holdings has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe FUJI Media Holdings is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

FUJI Media Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 0.696, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.449%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. FUJI Media Holdings pays 32.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJI Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $831.4M, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $505M. FUJI Media Holdings's net income of $46.5M is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $27.9M. Notably, FUJI Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJI Media Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.65x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KDDI has a net margin of 5.59% compared to FUJI Media Holdings's net margin of 12.74%. FUJI Media Holdings's return on equity of 4.26% beat KDDI's return on equity of 11.1%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJI Media Holdings has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe FUJI Media Holdings is more attractive than KDDI.

FUJI Media Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.060, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.049%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. KDDI offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. FUJI Media Holdings pays 32.6% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 46.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJI Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $831.4M, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $8.9B. FUJI Media Holdings's net income of $46.5M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.1B. Notably, FUJI Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while KDDI's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJI Media Holdings is 0.68x versus 1.68x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a net margin of 5.59% compared to FUJI Media Holdings's net margin of 8.46%. FUJI Media Holdings's return on equity of 4.26% beat Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's return on equity of 12.71%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.01%. Given that Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has higher upside potential than FUJI Media Holdings, analysts believe Nippon Telegraph & Telephone is more attractive than FUJI Media Holdings.

FUJI Media Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nippon Telegraph & Telephone has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.768%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. FUJI Media Holdings pays 32.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone pays out 32.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJI Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $831.4M, which are smaller than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone quarterly revenues of $20.8B. FUJI Media Holdings's net income of $46.5M is lower than Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's net income of $1.8B. Notably, FUJI Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while Nippon Telegraph & Telephone's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJI Media Holdings is 0.68x versus 0.93x for Nippon Telegraph & Telephone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 5.59% compared to FUJI Media Holdings's net margin of --. FUJI Media Holdings's return on equity of 4.26% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

FUJI Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJI Media Holdings has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe FUJI Media Holdings is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

FUJI Media Holdings has a beta of 0.582, which suggesting that the stock is 41.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FUJI Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FUJI Media Holdings pays 32.6% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FUJI Media Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJI Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $831.4M, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. FUJI Media Holdings's net income of $46.5M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, FUJI Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJI Media Holdings is 0.68x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.