EVVTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 63.27% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -0.71%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 30.01% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of -48.45%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.77%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.387, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 39.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $571.2M, which are smaller than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Evolution AB's net income of $361.4M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 7.91x versus 0.17x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hennes & Mauritz AB has a net margin of 63.27% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of 8.4%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 30.01% beat Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 24.23%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hennes & Mauritz AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.236%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Hennes & Mauritz AB offers a yield of 4.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Evolution AB pays 39.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hennes & Mauritz AB pays out 120.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Hennes & Mauritz AB's is not.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $571.2M, which are smaller than Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Evolution AB's net income of $361.4M is lower than Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $470.7M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while Hennes & Mauritz AB's PE ratio is 22.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 7.91x versus 0.98x for Hennes & Mauritz AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 63.27% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of --. Evolution AB's return on equity of 30.01% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of --.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 39.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $571.2M, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of --. Evolution AB's net income of $361.4M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of --. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 7.91x versus 0.06x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a net margin of 63.27% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -46.62%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 30.01% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's return on equity of --.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 50.35%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.868% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $2.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 39.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $571.2M, which are smaller than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Evolution AB's net income of $361.4M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's net income of -$267M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.77x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 7.91x versus 1.03x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.