EVVTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 54.21% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of 1.33%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 26.96% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of 10.44%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $19.18 which suggests that it could grow by 12.19%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.221%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 45.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $658.6M, which are smaller than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Evolution AB's net income of $357.1M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $49.5M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.92x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 4.98x versus 0.18x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 54.21% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -16.29%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 26.96% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of -80.43%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.497, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.321%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 45.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $658.6M, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of $148.8M. Evolution AB's net income of $357.1M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of -$24.2M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.92x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 4.98x versus 0.27x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a net margin of 54.21% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -46.62%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 26.96% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's return on equity of --.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.66%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 45.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $658.6M, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Evolution AB's net income of $357.1M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's net income of -$267M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.92x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 4.98x versus 0.48x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volvo Car AB has a net margin of 54.21% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -0.37%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 26.96% beat Volvo Car AB's return on equity of -2.1%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volvo Car AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Volvo Car AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Volvo Car AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.814% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volvo Car AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.35%. Volvo Car AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Evolution AB pays 45.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo Car AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $658.6M, which are smaller than Volvo Car AB quarterly revenues of $10B. Evolution AB's net income of $357.1M is higher than Volvo Car AB's net income of -$37.2M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.92x while Volvo Car AB's PE ratio is 460.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 4.98x versus 0.23x for Volvo Car AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.