EVGGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electrolux AB has a net margin of 49.76% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of 0.59%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 28.72% beat Electrolux AB's return on equity of 6.49%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electrolux AB has an analysts' consensus of $18.13 which suggests that it could grow by 41.76%. Given that Electrolux AB has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Electrolux AB is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electrolux AB has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.793%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Electrolux AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Electrolux AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $592.6M, which are smaller than Electrolux AB quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Evolution AB's net income of $294.9M is higher than Electrolux AB's net income of $20.2M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while Electrolux AB's PE ratio is 31.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.01x versus 0.13x for Electrolux AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a net margin of 49.76% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of 5.63%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 28.72% beat H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's return on equity of 26.16%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB has a beta of 1.223, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.262%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.91% of its earnings as a dividend. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB pays out 69.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $592.6M, which are smaller than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB quarterly revenues of $6B. Evolution AB's net income of $294.9M is lower than H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's net income of $335.3M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB's PE ratio is 27.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.01x versus 1.31x for H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nobia AB has a net margin of 49.76% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -82.8%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 28.72% beat Nobia AB's return on equity of -77.99%.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nobia AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Evolution AB has higher upside potential than Nobia AB, analysts believe Evolution AB is more attractive than Nobia AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nobia AB has a beta of 0.495, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.512%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Nobia AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Nobia AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $592.6M, which are larger than Nobia AB quarterly revenues of $242.5M. Evolution AB's net income of $294.9M is higher than Nobia AB's net income of -$200.8M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while Nobia AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.01x versus 0.20x for Nobia AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a net margin of 49.76% compared to Evolution AB's net margin of -46.62%. Evolution AB's return on equity of 28.72% beat Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's return on equity of --.

Evolution AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has higher upside potential than Evolution AB, analysts believe Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc is more attractive than Evolution AB.

Evolution AB has a beta of 1.570, which suggesting that the stock is 57.042% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Evolution AB has a quarterly dividend of $3.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evolution AB pays 44.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evolution AB quarterly revenues are $592.6M, which are larger than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc quarterly revenues of $572.6M. Evolution AB's net income of $294.9M is higher than Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's net income of -$267M. Notably, Evolution AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.11x while Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evolution AB is 6.01x versus 0.50x for Polestar Automotive Holding UK Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.