Financhill
Buy
60

EMHLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.27
Seasonality move :
-9.25%
Day range:
$0.27 - $0.31
52-week range:
$0.08 - $0.33
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.01x
P/B ratio:
1.28x
Volume:
5.5K
Avg. volume:
26.3K
1-year change:
198.56%
Market cap:
$55.7M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
EMHLF
European Metals Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
-- -- -- -- $54.75
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
-- -- -- -- $10.00
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
EMHLF
European Metals Holdings Ltd.
$0.27 -- $55.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.01x
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
$59.32 $54.75 $150.6B 16.71x $1.20 3.71% 2.94x
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
$4.45 -- $262.1M -- $0.00 0% --
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
$6.70 $10.00 $44.8M -- $0.00 0% --
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
$0.03 -- $11.3M 47.38x $0.01 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
EMHLF
European Metals Holdings Ltd.
-- -6.600 -- --
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
30.73% 0.437 -- 1.21x
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
-- 1.380 -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
-- 1.023 -- --
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
-- -0.979 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
EMHLF
European Metals Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
BHP
BHP Group Ltd.
-- -- 16.7% 23.67% -- --
IONR
ioneer Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
NVA
Nova Minerals Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --

European Metals Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns EMHLF or BHP?

    BHP Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat BHP Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 23.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- --
    BHP
    BHP Group Ltd.
    -- -- $69.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About EMHLF or BHP?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could fall by -7.7%. Given that BHP Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than European Metals Holdings Ltd., analysts believe BHP Group Ltd. is more attractive than European Metals Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    BHP
    BHP Group Ltd.
    1 4 1
  • Is EMHLF or BHP More Risky?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.722%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMHLF or BHP?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. European Metals Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd. pays out 61.13% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMHLF or BHP?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than BHP Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BHP Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for European Metals Holdings Ltd. is 0.01x versus 2.94x for BHP Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0.01x -- -- --
    BHP
    BHP Group Ltd.
    2.94x 16.71x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns EMHLF or IONR?

    ioneer Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat ioneer Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- --
    IONR
    ioneer Ltd.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMHLF or IONR?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ioneer Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 529.21%. Given that ioneer Ltd. has higher upside potential than European Metals Holdings Ltd., analysts believe ioneer Ltd. is more attractive than European Metals Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    IONR
    ioneer Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is EMHLF or IONR More Risky?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ioneer Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMHLF or IONR?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ioneer Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. European Metals Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ioneer Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMHLF or IONR?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ioneer Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than ioneer Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ioneer Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for European Metals Holdings Ltd. is 0.01x versus -- for ioneer Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0.01x -- -- --
    IONR
    ioneer Ltd.
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns EMHLF or NVA?

    Nova Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Nova Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- --
    NVA
    Nova Minerals Ltd.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMHLF or NVA?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that Nova Minerals Ltd. has higher upside potential than European Metals Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Nova Minerals Ltd. is more attractive than European Metals Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    NVA
    Nova Minerals Ltd.
    1 0 0
  • Is EMHLF or NVA More Risky?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMHLF or NVA?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. European Metals Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMHLF or NVA?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nova Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for European Metals Holdings Ltd. is 0.01x versus -- for Nova Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0.01x -- -- --
    NVA
    Nova Minerals Ltd.
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns EMHLF or SBMSF?

    Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- --
    SBMSF
    Danakali Ltd.
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About EMHLF or SBMSF?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that European Metals Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe European Metals Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    SBMSF
    Danakali Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is EMHLF or SBMSF More Risky?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.854, which suggesting that the stock is 14.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.643%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock EMHLF or SBMSF?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. European Metals Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios EMHLF or SBMSF?

    European Metals Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, European Metals Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for European Metals Holdings Ltd. is 0.01x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    EMHLF
    European Metals Holdings Ltd.
    0.01x -- -- --
    SBMSF
    Danakali Ltd.
    -- 47.38x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Alerts

Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.

Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20

BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.

Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20

Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock