DTEAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acme United has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of 4.62%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat Acme United's return on equity of 19.79%.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 976.71%. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.08%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Acme United, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Acme United.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.187, which suggesting that the stock is 118.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.72%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 11.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Acme United quarterly revenues of $48.2M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than Acme United's net income of $2.2M. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acme United's PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.12x versus 0.81x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Borealis Foods has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of -62.85%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83%.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 976.71%. On the other hand Borealis Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.187, which suggesting that the stock is 118.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Borealis Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Borealis Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Borealis Foods quarterly revenues of $7.7M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Borealis Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.12x versus -- for Borealis Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SNDL has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of -8.16%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat SNDL's return on equity of -8.76%.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 976.71%. On the other hand SNDL has an analysts' consensus of $3.21 which suggests that it could grow by 78.41%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than SNDL, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than SNDL.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.187, which suggesting that the stock is 118.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SNDL has a beta of 3.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 218.525%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SNDL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SNDL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SNDL quarterly revenues of $173.6M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than SNDL's net income of -$14.2M. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SNDL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.12x versus 0.71x for SNDL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Village Farms International has a net margin of -- compared to DAVIDsTEA's net margin of -0.98%. DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of -- beat Village Farms International's return on equity of -16.15%.

DAVIDsTEA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 976.71%. On the other hand Village Farms International has an analysts' consensus of $2.28 which suggests that it could grow by 195.41%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Village Farms International, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Village Farms International.

DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.187, which suggesting that the stock is 118.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Village Farms International has a beta of 2.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.903%.

DAVIDsTEA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Village Farms International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DAVIDsTEA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Village Farms International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Village Farms International quarterly revenues of $83.4M. DAVIDsTEA's net income of -- is lower than Village Farms International's net income of -$820K. Notably, DAVIDsTEA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Village Farms International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DAVIDsTEA is 0.12x versus 0.26x for Village Farms International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.