BRLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acme United has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of 3.72%. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat Acme United's return on equity of 9.74%.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Acme United has an analysts' consensus of $58.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.98%. Given that Acme United has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe Acme United is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acme United has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.072%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Acme United offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United pays out 22.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Acme United's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are smaller than Acme United quarterly revenues of $45.9M. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Acme United's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Acme United's PE ratio is 16.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 0.87x for Acme United. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

BioHarvest Sciences has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of -41.12%. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of --.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BioHarvest Sciences has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 150.71%. Given that BioHarvest Sciences has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe BioHarvest Sciences is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.43%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BioHarvest Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BioHarvest Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues of $6.5M. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is lower than BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BioHarvest Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 4.01x for BioHarvest Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DAVIDsTEA has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of --. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of --.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DAVIDsTEA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 464.41%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than Borealis Foods.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 2.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.494%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DAVIDsTEA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DAVIDsTEA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues of --. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is higher than DAVIDsTEA's net income of --. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DAVIDsTEA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus 0.23x for DAVIDsTEA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sensible Meats has a net margin of -62.85% compared to Borealis Foods's net margin of --. Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83% beat Sensible Meats's return on equity of --.

Borealis Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sensible Meats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Borealis Foods has higher upside potential than Sensible Meats, analysts believe Borealis Foods is more attractive than Sensible Meats.

Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sensible Meats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Borealis Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sensible Meats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Borealis Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sensible Meats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Borealis Foods quarterly revenues are $7.7M, which are larger than Sensible Meats quarterly revenues of --. Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M is higher than Sensible Meats's net income of --. Notably, Borealis Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sensible Meats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borealis Foods is -- versus -- for Sensible Meats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.