Are We Heading Toward a Recession?
Fears of a recession in 2025 grew at the end…
Sell
47
BHST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.5400
Seasonality move
:
-5.51%
Day range:
$6.4100 - $6.5600
52-week range:
$0.0011 - $7.3800
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
4.14x
P/B ratio:
83.91x
Volume:
4.7K
Avg. volume:
37.1K
1-year change:
5.21%
Market cap:
$111.6M
Revenue:
$25.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.33
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences
|
$7.8M | -$0.12 | 48.09% | -100% | $14.7500 |
|
ABVE
Above Food Ingredients
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DTEAF
DAVIDsTEA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RRSFF
Aretto Wellness
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SSMTF
Sensible Meats
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences
|
$6.4406 | $14.7500 | $111.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.14x |
|
ABVE
Above Food Ingredients
|
$0.90 | -- | $25.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods
|
$6.01 | -- | $128.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.41x |
|
DTEAF
DAVIDsTEA
|
$0.43 | -- | $11.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.16x |
|
RRSFF
Aretto Wellness
|
$0.0122 | -- | $132.6K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.10x |
|
SSMTF
Sensible Meats
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences
|
22.37% | -0.662 | 1.22% | 0.48x |
|
ABVE
Above Food Ingredients
|
145.3% | -1.114 | -- | 0.20x |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods
|
85.27% | 3.766 | 24.01% | 0.12x |
|
DTEAF
DAVIDsTEA
|
-- | -0.276 | -- | -- |
|
RRSFF
Aretto Wellness
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SSMTF
Sensible Meats
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences
|
$3.7M | -$2.1M | -331.74% | -- | -32.15% | -$2.3M |
|
ABVE
Above Food Ingredients
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | $2.8M |
|
BRLS
Borealis Foods
|
$1.3M | -$3.6M | -4.73% | -18.83% | -47.14% | -$3.8M |
|
DTEAF
DAVIDsTEA
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RRSFF
Aretto Wellness
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SSMTF
Sensible Meats
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BioHarvest Sciences vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BHST or ABVE?
Above Food Ingredients has a net margin of -41.12% compared to BioHarvest Sciences's net margin of --. BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of -- beat Above Food Ingredients's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHSTBioHarvest Sciences56.8% -$0.16 $5.3M ABVEAbove Food Ingredients-- -- $38.8M -
What do Analysts Say About BHST or ABVE?
BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $14.7500, signalling upside risk potential of 129.02%. On the other hand Above Food Ingredients has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BioHarvest Sciences has higher upside potential than Above Food Ingredients, analysts believe BioHarvest Sciences is more attractive than Above Food Ingredients.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHSTBioHarvest Sciences1 0 0 ABVEAbove Food Ingredients0 0 0 -
Is BHST or ABVE More Risky?
BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.251, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Above Food Ingredients has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHST or ABVE?
BioHarvest Sciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Above Food Ingredients offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BioHarvest Sciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Above Food Ingredients pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHST or ABVE?
BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are larger than Above Food Ingredients quarterly revenues of --. BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M is higher than Above Food Ingredients's net income of --. Notably, BioHarvest Sciences's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Above Food Ingredients's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BioHarvest Sciences is 4.14x versus -- for Above Food Ingredients. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHSTBioHarvest Sciences4.14x -- $6.5M -$2.7M ABVEAbove Food Ingredients-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHST or BRLS?
Borealis Foods has a net margin of -41.12% compared to BioHarvest Sciences's net margin of -62.85%. BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of -- beat Borealis Foods's return on equity of -18.83%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHSTBioHarvest Sciences56.8% -$0.16 $5.3M BRLSBorealis Foods16.56% -$0.23 $34.4M -
What do Analysts Say About BHST or BRLS?
BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $14.7500, signalling upside risk potential of 129.02%. On the other hand Borealis Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BioHarvest Sciences has higher upside potential than Borealis Foods, analysts believe BioHarvest Sciences is more attractive than Borealis Foods.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHSTBioHarvest Sciences1 0 0 BRLSBorealis Foods0 0 0 -
Is BHST or BRLS More Risky?
BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.251, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Borealis Foods has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHST or BRLS?
BioHarvest Sciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Borealis Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BioHarvest Sciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Borealis Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHST or BRLS?
BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Borealis Foods quarterly revenues of $7.7M. BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M is higher than Borealis Foods's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, BioHarvest Sciences's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Borealis Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BioHarvest Sciences is 4.14x versus 4.41x for Borealis Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHSTBioHarvest Sciences4.14x -- $6.5M -$2.7M BRLSBorealis Foods4.41x -- $7.7M -$4.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns BHST or DTEAF?
DAVIDsTEA has a net margin of -41.12% compared to BioHarvest Sciences's net margin of --. BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of -- beat DAVIDsTEA's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHSTBioHarvest Sciences56.8% -$0.16 $5.3M DTEAFDAVIDsTEA-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BHST or DTEAF?
BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $14.7500, signalling upside risk potential of 129.02%. On the other hand DAVIDsTEA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 708.06%. Given that DAVIDsTEA has higher upside potential than BioHarvest Sciences, analysts believe DAVIDsTEA is more attractive than BioHarvest Sciences.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHSTBioHarvest Sciences1 0 0 DTEAFDAVIDsTEA0 0 0 -
Is BHST or DTEAF More Risky?
BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.251, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DAVIDsTEA has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.928%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHST or DTEAF?
BioHarvest Sciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DAVIDsTEA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BioHarvest Sciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DAVIDsTEA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHST or DTEAF?
BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are larger than DAVIDsTEA quarterly revenues of --. BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M is higher than DAVIDsTEA's net income of --. Notably, BioHarvest Sciences's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DAVIDsTEA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BioHarvest Sciences is 4.14x versus 0.16x for DAVIDsTEA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHSTBioHarvest Sciences4.14x -- $6.5M -$2.7M DTEAFDAVIDsTEA0.16x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHST or RRSFF?
Aretto Wellness has a net margin of -41.12% compared to BioHarvest Sciences's net margin of --. BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of -- beat Aretto Wellness's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHSTBioHarvest Sciences56.8% -$0.16 $5.3M RRSFFAretto Wellness-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BHST or RRSFF?
BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $14.7500, signalling upside risk potential of 129.02%. On the other hand Aretto Wellness has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BioHarvest Sciences has higher upside potential than Aretto Wellness, analysts believe BioHarvest Sciences is more attractive than Aretto Wellness.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHSTBioHarvest Sciences1 0 0 RRSFFAretto Wellness0 0 0 -
Is BHST or RRSFF More Risky?
BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.251, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aretto Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHST or RRSFF?
BioHarvest Sciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aretto Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BioHarvest Sciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aretto Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHST or RRSFF?
BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are larger than Aretto Wellness quarterly revenues of --. BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M is higher than Aretto Wellness's net income of --. Notably, BioHarvest Sciences's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aretto Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BioHarvest Sciences is 4.14x versus 1.10x for Aretto Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHSTBioHarvest Sciences4.14x -- $6.5M -$2.7M RRSFFAretto Wellness1.10x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHST or SSMTF?
Sensible Meats has a net margin of -41.12% compared to BioHarvest Sciences's net margin of --. BioHarvest Sciences's return on equity of -- beat Sensible Meats's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHSTBioHarvest Sciences56.8% -$0.16 $5.3M SSMTFSensible Meats-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BHST or SSMTF?
BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $14.7500, signalling upside risk potential of 129.02%. On the other hand Sensible Meats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BioHarvest Sciences has higher upside potential than Sensible Meats, analysts believe BioHarvest Sciences is more attractive than Sensible Meats.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHSTBioHarvest Sciences1 0 0 SSMTFSensible Meats0 0 0 -
Is BHST or SSMTF More Risky?
BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.251, which suggesting that the stock is 25.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sensible Meats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHST or SSMTF?
BioHarvest Sciences has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sensible Meats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BioHarvest Sciences pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sensible Meats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHST or SSMTF?
BioHarvest Sciences quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are larger than Sensible Meats quarterly revenues of --. BioHarvest Sciences's net income of -$2.7M is higher than Sensible Meats's net income of --. Notably, BioHarvest Sciences's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sensible Meats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BioHarvest Sciences is 4.14x versus -- for Sensible Meats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHSTBioHarvest Sciences4.14x -- $6.5M -$2.7M SSMTFSensible Meats-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Recession-Proof ETFs to Invest in Now
The U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) contracted 0.3% during the…
Is Butterfly Network the Best Small-Cap Stock?
Brought to public trading by an SPAC merger in early…
Stock Ideas
Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.
Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.
Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10
Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.
