Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
69
CRYYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.46
Seasonality move
:
-7.27%
Day range:
$0.46 - $0.46
52-week range:
$0.38 - $0.46
Dividend yield:
5.11%
P/E ratio:
10.35x
P/S ratio:
1.06x
P/B ratio:
0.76x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
22.5%
Market cap:
$4.9B
Revenue:
$4.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRYYF
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$39.3M | -- | 154.52% | -- | $1.50 |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRYYF
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.46 | -- | $4.9B | 10.35x | $0.02 | 5.11% | 1.06x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.29 | -- | $6.7M | 0.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$1.10 | -- | $5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.09x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$0.44 | -- | $5.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.76x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$0.86 | $1.50 | $76.5M | 5,082.14x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
$1.35 | -- | $6.5M | 2.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRYYF
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.
|
22.41% | -0.082 | 35.68% | 1.43x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
26.7% | 0.691 | 18.7% | 2.59x |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-3.29% | -3.023 | 1.23% | 0.14x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
2.43% | 0.097 | 5.49% | 16.39x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
23.84% | 1.914 | 51.39% | 0.50x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
1.33% | -0.291 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRYYF
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.
|
$277.1M | $104.2M | 6.68% | 8.26% | 10.49% | $74.8M |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -15.63% | -28.71% | -- | -- |
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$274.1K | -$755.1K | -211.34% | -263.14% | -80.65% | -$73.4K |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$225.1K | -$449.8K | -10.36% | -18.03% | -54.81% | -$700K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$4M | -5.52% | -7.17% | -6.62% | $6M |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CRYYF or AEHL?
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 10.83% compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.27.89% $0.01 $8.7B AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.-- -- $24.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CRYYF or AEHL?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRYYF or AEHL More Risky?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.033%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRYYF or AEHL?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. pays 47.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRYYF or AEHL?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $993.7M, which are larger than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $107.6M is higher than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is 1.06x versus 0.05x for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.1.06x 10.35x $993.7M $107.6M AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0.05x 0.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRYYF or AIHS?
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a net margin of 10.83% compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -77.29%. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.27.89% $0.01 $8.7B AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.29.28% -$0.43 $9.9K -
What do Analysts Say About CRYYF or AIHS?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Senmiao Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology Ltd., analysts believe China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Senmiao Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRYYF or AIHS More Risky?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.306%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRYYF or AIHS?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Senmiao Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. pays 47.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRYYF or AIHS?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $993.7M, which are larger than Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of $936.3K. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $107.6M is higher than Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K. Notably, China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is 1.06x versus 1.09x for Senmiao Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.1.06x 10.35x $993.7M $107.6M AIHSSenmiao Technology Ltd.1.09x -- $936.3K -$723.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns CRYYF or ATXG?
Addentax Group Corp. has a net margin of 10.83% compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of -101.37%. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat Addentax Group Corp.'s return on equity of -18.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.27.89% $0.01 $8.7B ATXGAddentax Group Corp.27.43% -$0.01 $26.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CRYYF or ATXG?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Addentax Group Corp., analysts believe China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Addentax Group Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CRYYF or ATXG More Risky?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRYYF or ATXG?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Addentax Group Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. pays 47.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRYYF or ATXG?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $993.7M, which are larger than Addentax Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $820.7K. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $107.6M is higher than Addentax Group Corp.'s net income of -$831.9K. Notably, China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while Addentax Group Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is 1.06x versus 0.76x for Addentax Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.1.06x 10.35x $993.7M $107.6M ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0.76x -- $820.7K -$831.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CRYYF or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a net margin of 10.83% compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of 3.42%. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.27.89% $0.01 $8.7B CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CRYYF or CBAT?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 73.81%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CRYYF or CBAT More Risky?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.306%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRYYF or CBAT?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. pays 47.51% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRYYF or CBAT?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $993.7M, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues of $60.9M. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $107.6M is higher than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M. Notably, China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5,082.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is 1.06x versus 0.48x for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.1.06x 10.35x $993.7M $107.6M CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.48x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns CRYYF or NISN?
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 10.83% compared to China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.27.89% $0.01 $8.7B NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CRYYF or NISN?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6640.74%. Given that Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd., analysts believe Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRYYF or NISN More Risky?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -1.097, which suggesting that the stock is 209.68% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRYYF or NISN?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.11%. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. pays 47.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRYYF or NISN?
China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $993.7M, which are larger than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $107.6M is higher than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.35x while Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd. is 1.06x versus 0.02x for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRYYFChina Railway Signal & Communication Corp. Ltd.1.06x 10.35x $993.7M $107.6M NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0.02x 2.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
