Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
36
CBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.89
Seasonality move
:
-4.24%
Day range:
$0.88 - $0.89
52-week range:
$0.57 - $1.28
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5,082.14x
P/S ratio:
0.49x
P/B ratio:
0.65x
Volume:
93.4K
Avg. volume:
120.5K
1-year change:
4.22%
Market cap:
$78.5M
Revenue:
$176.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$39.3M | -- | 154.52% | -- | $1.50 |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$16.8M | -$0.06 | 113.97% | -61.58% | $17.17 |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$890.3M | $2.35 | 2.87% | -5.42% | $159.00 |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$14.1M | -$0.12 | -4.28% | -46.95% | $5.67 |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$2.6M | -- | 254.61% | -- | $7.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$0.89 | $1.50 | $78.5M | 5,082.14x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.49x |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$8.52 | $17.17 | $1.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 17.63x |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
$0.29 | -- | $4.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 14.42x |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$149.77 | $159.00 | $5.5B | 17.51x | $0.26 | 0.67% | 1.58x |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.40 | $5.67 | $29.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.37x |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$3.16 | $7.50 | $109.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.38x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
23.84% | 1.914 | 51.39% | 0.50x |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
26.76% | 4.594 | 2.75% | 5.94x |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | 2.491 | -- | -- |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
39.43% | 0.995 | 28.85% | 1.25x |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
142.23% | 1.747 | 17.73% | 0.28x |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
69.52% | 1.665 | 3.19% | 1.15x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$4M | -5.52% | -7.17% | -6.62% | $6M |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$3.3M | -$4.7M | -27.53% | -41.32% | -21.9% | -$9.7M |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$279.4M | $115.4M | 10.82% | 18.05% | 12.13% | $197.1M |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$3.5M | -$2.2M | -73.21% | -490.96% | -16.53% | $726K |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$1.6M | -$854.3K | -100.27% | -165.36% | -12.85% | -$2.5M |
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or AMPX?
Amprius Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -18.17%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.15.49% -$0.03 $140.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or AMPX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.17 which suggests that it could grow by 96.87%. Given that Amprius Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe Amprius Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.7 0 0 -
Is CBAT or AMPX More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or AMPX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or AMPX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Amprius Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $21.4M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.9M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 17.63x for Amprius Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.49x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.17.63x -- $21.4M -$3.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or DFEL?
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBAT or DFEL More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.214, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.365%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 14.42x for China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.49x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.14.42x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or ENS?
EnerSys has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 7.19%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 18.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M ENSEnerSys29.37% $1.80 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or ENS?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $159.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.16%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than EnerSys.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 ENSEnerSys3 1 0 -
Is CBAT or ENS More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.982%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or ENS?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or ENS?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $951.3M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $68.4M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while EnerSys's PE ratio is 17.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 1.58x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.49x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M ENSEnerSys1.58x 17.51x $951.3M $68.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or FLUX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -19.45%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.67 which suggests that it could grow by 304.76%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CBAT or FLUX More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.677%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.2M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 0.37x for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.49x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.37x -- $13.2M -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or NEOV?
NeoVolta, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -18.7%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat NeoVolta, Inc.'s return on equity of -165.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.23.72% -$0.04 $7M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or NEOV?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.14%. On the other hand NeoVolta, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 137.34%. Given that NeoVolta, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe NeoVolta, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is CBAT or NEOV More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta, Inc. has a beta of -0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.482%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or NEOV?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or NEOV?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than NeoVolta, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.7M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than NeoVolta, Inc.'s net income of -$1.2M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while NeoVolta, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.49x versus 7.38x for NeoVolta, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.49x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.7.38x -- $6.7M -$1.2M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
87
HUT alert for Dec 25
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Buy
60
GPCR alert for Dec 25
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.
