Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
41
CBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.87
Seasonality move
:
-4.24%
Day range:
$0.87 - $0.90
52-week range:
$0.57 - $1.28
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5,082.14x
P/S ratio:
0.51x
P/B ratio:
0.67x
Volume:
105.9K
Avg. volume:
152.6K
1-year change:
-3.72%
Market cap:
$81.4M
Revenue:
$176.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$39.3M | -- | 154.52% | -- | $1.50 |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$14.1M | -$0.12 | -4.28% | -46.95% | $5.67 |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$0.92 | $1.50 | $81.4M | 5,082.14x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.51x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
$3.23 | -- | $16.7M | 0.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$0.48 | -- | $5.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.82x |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
$0.29 | -- | $271.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 14.42x |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.64 | $5.67 | $35M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.43x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
$3.43 | -- | $16.5M | 2.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.04x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
23.84% | 1.914 | 51.39% | 0.50x |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
26.7% | 0.691 | 18.7% | 2.59x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
2.43% | 0.097 | 5.49% | 16.39x |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | 2.491 | -- | -- |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
142.23% | 1.747 | 17.73% | 0.28x |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
1.33% | -0.291 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$4M | -5.52% | -7.17% | -6.62% | $6M |
|
AEHL
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -15.63% | -28.71% | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
|
$225.1K | -$449.8K | -10.36% | -18.03% | -54.81% | -$700K |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$3.5M | -$2.2M | -73.21% | -490.96% | -16.53% | $726K |
|
NISN
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or AEHL?
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.-- -- $24.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or AEHL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 63.4%. On the other hand Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CBAT or AEHL More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.700, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.033%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or AEHL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or AEHL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.13x for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.51x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M AEHLAntelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd.0.13x 0.09x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or ATXG?
Addentax Group Corp. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -101.37%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Addentax Group Corp.'s return on equity of -18.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M ATXGAddentax Group Corp.27.43% -$0.01 $26.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or ATXG?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 63.4%. On the other hand Addentax Group Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than Addentax Group Corp., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than Addentax Group Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CBAT or ATXG More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or ATXG?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Addentax Group Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or ATXG?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Addentax Group Corp. quarterly revenues of $820.7K. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Addentax Group Corp.'s net income of -$831.9K. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Addentax Group Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.82x for Addentax Group Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.51x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M ATXGAddentax Group Corp.0.82x -- $820.7K -$831.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or DFEL?
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 63.4%. On the other hand China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBAT or DFEL More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.214, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 121.365%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.51x versus 14.42x for China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.51x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.14.42x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or FLUX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -19.45%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.26.67% -$0.15 $7.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 63.4%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.67 which suggests that it could grow by 245.53%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CBAT or FLUX More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.677%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.2M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$2.6M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.43x for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.51x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.43x -- $13.2M -$2.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or NISN?
Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or NISN?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 63.4%. On the other hand Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2553.06%. Given that Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CBAT or NISN More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.306% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or NISN?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or NISN?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.51x versus 0.04x for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.51x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M NISNNisun International Enterprise Development Group Co., Ltd.0.04x 2.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
