Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
75
CBAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.03
Seasonality move
:
-1.81%
Day range:
$0.94 - $1.05
52-week range:
$0.57 - $1.25
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5,082.14x
P/S ratio:
0.58x
P/B ratio:
0.76x
Volume:
219.2K
Avg. volume:
179.1K
1-year change:
19.6%
Market cap:
$92.2M
Revenue:
$176.6M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$78.9M | -- | 95.1% | -- | $1.50 |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$26.8M | -$0.04 | 107.52% | -49.62% | $17.57 |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$913.7M | $2.66 | -0.17% | 23.41% | $188.10 |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$11.8M | -$0.04 | -40.94% | -56.97% | $5.33 |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -- | 123.43% | -- | $7.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$1.04 | $1.50 | $92.2M | 5,082.14x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.58x |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$9.52 | $17.57 | $1.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 19.69x |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
$0.91 | -- | $13.7M | 16.76x | $0.00 | 0% | 4.98x |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$173.21 | $188.10 | $6.4B | 21.44x | $0.26 | 0.58% | 1.79x |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.51 | $5.33 | $32.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$3.67 | $7.50 | $156.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.96x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
23.84% | 2.227 | 51.39% | 0.50x |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
26.76% | 6.217 | 2.75% | 5.94x |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
-- | 3.362 | -- | 1.14x |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
38.4% | 0.876 | 21.86% | 1.20x |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
43.5% | 1.446 | 21.41% | 0.43x |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
46.59% | 2.695 | 3.97% | 1.55x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
|
$4.9M | -$4M | -5.52% | -7.17% | -6.62% | $6M |
|
AMPX
Amprius Technologies, Inc.
|
$3.3M | -$4.7M | -27.53% | -41.32% | -21.9% | -$9.7M |
|
DFEL
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.
|
$4.3K | $2.7K | 13.23% | 13.23% | 6.84% | -$105.7K |
|
ENS
EnerSys
|
$278.2M | $130.4M | 10.03% | 16.65% | 14.19% | $171.3M |
|
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
|
$4.6M | $795K | -49.8% | -490.96% | 5.63% | -$5.3M |
|
NEOV
NeoVolta, Inc.
|
$664.2K | -$4.5M | -154.56% | -287.71% | -96.36% | -$2.6M |
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or AMPX?
Amprius Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -18.17%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.15.49% -$0.03 $140.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or AMPX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.23%. On the other hand Amprius Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $17.57 which suggests that it could grow by 84.57%. Given that Amprius Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe Amprius Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.7 0 0 -
Is CBAT or AMPX More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amprius Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or AMPX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amprius Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amprius Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or AMPX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Amprius Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $21.4M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$3.9M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Amprius Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.58x versus 19.69x for Amprius Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.58x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M AMPXAmprius Technologies, Inc.19.69x -- $21.4M -$3.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or DFEL?
China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 6.84%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.10.89% $0.00 $15.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.23%. On the other hand China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc., analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CBAT or DFEL More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.5%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or DFEL?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5K. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s net income of $2.7K. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.58x versus 4.98x for China TMK Battery Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.58x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M DFELChina TMK Battery Systems, Inc.4.98x 16.76x $39.5K $2.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or ENS?
EnerSys has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat EnerSys's return on equity of 16.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M ENSEnerSys30.27% $2.40 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or ENS?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.23%. On the other hand EnerSys has an analysts' consensus of $188.10 which suggests that it could grow by 8.6%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has higher upside potential than EnerSys, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is more attractive than EnerSys.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 ENSEnerSys3 2 0 -
Is CBAT or ENS More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EnerSys has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.638%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or ENS?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EnerSys offers a yield of 0.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys pays out 10.51% of its earnings as a dividend. EnerSys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or ENS?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are smaller than EnerSys quarterly revenues of $919.1M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is lower than EnerSys's net income of $90.4M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while EnerSys's PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.58x versus 1.79x for EnerSys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.58x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M ENSEnerSys1.79x 21.44x $919.1M $90.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or FLUX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of 4.26%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -490.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.32.89% $0.03 $13.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.23%. On the other hand Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.33 which suggests that it could grow by 253.2%. Given that Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe Flux Power Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.3 0 0 -
Is CBAT or FLUX More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flux Power Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.355%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flux Power Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or FLUX?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than Flux Power Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.1M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $601K. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while Flux Power Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.58x versus 0.45x for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.58x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M FLUXFlux Power Holdings, Inc.0.45x -- $14.1M $601K
-
Which has Higher Returns CBAT or NEOV?
NeoVolta, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net margin of -119.23%. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.17% beat NeoVolta, Inc.'s return on equity of -287.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.8% $0.03 $156.5M NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.14.3% -$0.16 $9.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CBAT or NEOV?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.50, signalling upside risk potential of 44.23%. On the other hand NeoVolta, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 104.36%. Given that NeoVolta, Inc. has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., analysts believe NeoVolta, Inc. is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0 0 0 NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is CBAT or NEOV More Risky?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a beta of 1.297, which suggesting that the stock is 29.732% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta, Inc. has a beta of -0.282, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.239%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CBAT or NEOV?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NeoVolta, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CBAT or NEOV?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. quarterly revenues are $60.9M, which are larger than NeoVolta, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.6M. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s net income of $2.1M is higher than NeoVolta, Inc.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5,082.14x while NeoVolta, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is 0.58x versus 6.96x for NeoVolta, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.0.58x 5,082.14x $60.9M $2.1M NEOVNeoVolta, Inc.6.96x -- $4.6M -$5.5M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
