Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
$3.4B | $8.14 | 1.54% | -99.19% | $142.86 |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
$2.4B | $0.07 | -5.04% | -67.05% | $5.03 |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
$3.2B | $3.54 | 1.15% | 14.69% | $211.10 |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$1.15 | -- | $5.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.14x |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
$132.05 | $142.86 | $4.6B | 8.19x | $10.00 | 0% | 0.40x |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.0544 | -- | $6.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 10.33x |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
$5.33 | $5.03 | $1.7B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.20x |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
$197.00 | $211.10 | $8B | 16.71x | $0.91 | 1.75% | 0.66x |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
$0.07 | -- | $500.4K | 0.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
-3.29% | -3.023 | 1.23% | 0.14x |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
109.16% | 3.403 | 503.77% | 0.45x |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
-60.85% | 8.353 | 29.72% | 0.00x |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
101.65% | 0.051 | 925.31% | 1.28x |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
74.08% | 1.513 | 116.08% | 0.81x |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
-88.23% | 0.832 | 627.35% | 0.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
$274.1K | -$755.1K | -211.34% | -263.14% | -80.65% | -$73.4K |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
$1.3B | $708M | -8.28% | -- | 20.12% | -$1.5B |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
-$43.8K | -$333.5K | -- | -- | -161.74% | -$99.1K |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
$542M | $294M | -5.39% | -628.83% | 11.86% | -$1.1B |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
$651M | $285M | 4.21% | 16.29% | 8.99% | -$85M |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
$1.1M | -$2M | -- | -- | -85.79% | -$623.7K |
Avis Budget Group, Inc. has a net margin of -77.29% compared to Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net margin of 10.23%. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14% beat Avis Budget Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
29.28% | -$0.43 | $9.9K |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
36.18% | $10.11 | $26.2B |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avis Budget Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $142.86 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that Avis Budget Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology Ltd., analysts believe Avis Budget Group, Inc. is more attractive than Senmiao Technology Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
2 | 5 | 1 |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avis Budget Group, Inc. has a beta of 2.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.96%.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avis Budget Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avis Budget Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are $936.3K, which are smaller than Avis Budget Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K is lower than Avis Budget Group, Inc.'s net income of $360M. Notably, Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Avis Budget Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology Ltd. is 1.14x versus 0.40x for Avis Budget Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
1.14x | -- | $936.3K | -$723.7K |
|
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
|
0.40x | 8.19x | $3.5B | $360M |
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -77.29% compared to Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net margin of -1935.65%. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14% beat DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
29.28% | -$0.43 | $9.9K |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
-21.24% | -$0.04 | -$4.9M |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Senmiao Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Senmiao Technology Ltd. is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -7.518, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 851.768%.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are $936.3K, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $206.2K. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K is higher than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology Ltd. is 1.14x versus 10.33x for DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
1.14x | -- | $936.3K | -$723.7K |
|
DWAY
DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.
|
10.33x | -- | $206.2K | -$4M |
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -77.29% compared to Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net margin of 7.43%. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14% beat Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -628.83%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
29.28% | -$0.43 | $9.9K |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
21.87% | $0.51 | $19.2B |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.03 which suggests that it could fall by -5.72%. Given that Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology Ltd., analysts believe Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Senmiao Technology Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
0 | 6 | 1 |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are $936.3K, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K is lower than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $184M. Notably, Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology Ltd. is 1.14x versus 0.20x for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
1.14x | -- | $936.3K | -$723.7K |
|
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
|
0.20x | -- | $2.5B | $184M |
Ryder System, Inc. has a net margin of -77.29% compared to Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net margin of 4.35%. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14% beat Ryder System, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.29%.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
29.28% | -$0.43 | $9.9K |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
20.53% | $3.29 | $11.9B |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ryder System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.10 which suggests that it could grow by 7.16%. Given that Ryder System, Inc. has higher upside potential than Senmiao Technology Ltd., analysts believe Ryder System, Inc. is more attractive than Senmiao Technology Ltd..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
7 | 1 | 0 |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System, Inc. has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.931%.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc. pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are $936.3K, which are smaller than Ryder System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K is lower than Ryder System, Inc.'s net income of $138M. Notably, Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryder System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology Ltd. is 1.14x versus 0.66x for Ryder System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
1.14x | -- | $936.3K | -$723.7K |
|
R
Ryder System, Inc.
|
0.66x | 16.71x | $3.2B | $138M |
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -77.29% compared to Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net margin of -34.72%. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of -263.14% beat Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
| Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
29.28% | -$0.43 | $9.9K |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
47.65% | -$0.07 | -$14.7M |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Senmiao Technology Ltd. has higher upside potential than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Senmiao Technology Ltd. is more attractive than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc..
| Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a beta of 0.907, which suggesting that the stock is 9.306% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Senmiao Technology Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
Senmiao Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues are $936.3K, which are smaller than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s net income of -$723.7K is higher than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$794.1K. Notably, Senmiao Technology Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Senmiao Technology Ltd. is 1.14x versus 0.05x for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
| Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AIHS
Senmiao Technology Ltd.
|
1.14x | -- | $936.3K | -$723.7K |
|
ZCAR
Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.
|
0.05x | 0.33x | $2.3M | -$794.1K |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 0.65% over the past day.
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 2.36% over the past day.