ZCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avis Budget Group, Inc. has a net margin of -30.51% compared to Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -32.13%. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Avis Budget Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avis Budget Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $106.43 which suggests that it could fall by -44.11%. Given that Avis Budget Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Avis Budget Group, Inc. is more attractive than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc..

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avis Budget Group, Inc. has a beta of 1.938, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.754%.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avis Budget Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avis Budget Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Avis Budget Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$721.5K is higher than Avis Budget Group, Inc.'s net income of -$856M. Notably, Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.33x while Avis Budget Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. is 0.08x versus 0.65x for Avis Budget Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -30.51% compared to Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1935.65%. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc..

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -6.132, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 713.2%.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $282.2K. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$721.5K is lower than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $548.9K. Notably, Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.33x while DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. is 0.08x versus 10.36x for DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System, Inc. has a net margin of -30.51% compared to Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 4.16%. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Ryder System, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.23%.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ryder System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $227.22 which suggests that it could grow by 10.33%. Given that Ryder System, Inc. has higher upside potential than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Ryder System, Inc. is more attractive than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc..

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System, Inc. has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.619%.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc. pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Ryder System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$721.5K is lower than Ryder System, Inc.'s net income of $132M. Notably, Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.33x while Ryder System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. is 0.08x versus 0.68x for Ryder System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a net margin of -30.51% compared to Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -3.24%. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 1.22%.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand U-Haul Holding Co. has an analysts' consensus of $75.45 which suggests that it could grow by 59.55%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than Zoomcar Holdings, Inc..

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.779%.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$721.5K is higher than U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of -$45.8M. Notably, Zoomcar Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.33x while U-Haul Holding Co.'s PE ratio is 99.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zoomcar Holdings, Inc. is 0.08x versus 1.55x for U-Haul Holding Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.