HTZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of -51.71% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of -479.76%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.57, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hertz Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Hertz Global Holdings is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -5.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 691.252%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $110.4K. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B is lower than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$529.7K. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.12x versus 5.29x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H&E Equipment Services has a net margin of -51.71% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of 8.07%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43% beat H&E Equipment Services's return on equity of 26.17%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.57, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand H&E Equipment Services has an analysts' consensus of $69.40 which suggests that it could grow by 30.51%. Given that H&E Equipment Services has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe H&E Equipment Services is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 1.844, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.439%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H&E Equipment Services offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services pays out 23.65% of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than H&E Equipment Services quarterly revenues of $384.9M. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B is lower than H&E Equipment Services's net income of $31.1M. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H&E Equipment Services's PE ratio is 12.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.12x versus 1.19x for H&E Equipment Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -51.71% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of 4.46%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43% beat Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.57, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $168.70 which suggests that it could grow by 5.88%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.778%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B is lower than Ryder System's net income of $142M. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryder System's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.12x versus 0.57x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of -51.71% compared to Hertz Global Holdings's net margin of 11.27%. Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43% beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.57, signalling downside risk potential of -3.51%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $98.55 which suggests that it could grow by 41.72%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.09%.

Hertz Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hertz Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B is lower than U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M. Notably, Hertz Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 30.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hertz Global Holdings is 0.12x versus 2.42x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.