UHAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a net margin of -3.24% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of -1.19%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 1.22% beat Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.98%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $76.45, signalling upside risk potential of 47.67%. On the other hand Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.75 which suggests that it could grow by 2.79%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Custom Truck One Source, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than Custom Truck One Source, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a beta of 1.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.325%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Custom Truck One Source, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Custom Truck One Source, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Custom Truck One Source, Inc. quarterly revenues of $482.1M. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of -$45.8M is lower than Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.76x while Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s PE ratio is 48.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.69x versus 0.89x for Custom Truck One Source, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -3.24% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of -1935.65%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 1.22% beat DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $76.45, signalling upside risk potential of 47.67%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -7.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 849.199%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $206.2K. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of -$45.8M is lower than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.76x while DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.69x versus 7.84x for DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -3.24% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of 7.43%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 1.22% beat Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -628.83%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $76.45, signalling upside risk potential of 47.67%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.75 which suggests that it could grow by 1.82%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of -$45.8M is lower than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $184M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.76x while Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.69x versus 0.18x for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System, Inc. has a net margin of -3.24% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of 4.16%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 1.22% beat Ryder System, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.23%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $76.45, signalling upside risk potential of 47.67%. On the other hand Ryder System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $227.22 which suggests that it could grow by 1.41%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Ryder System, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than Ryder System, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.571% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System, Inc. has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.607%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc. pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ryder System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of -$45.8M is lower than Ryder System, Inc.'s net income of $132M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 108.76x while Ryder System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.69x versus 0.74x for Ryder System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.