UHAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.62% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of -1935.65%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 2.59% beat DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $92.45, signalling upside risk potential of 49.29%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. has a beta of -7.518, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 851.768%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $206.2K. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of $96.7M is higher than DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$4M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.51x while DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.77x versus 7.22x for DriveItAway Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.62% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of 7.43%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 2.59% beat Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -628.83%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $92.45, signalling upside risk potential of 49.29%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.39 which suggests that it could fall by -15.85%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.5B. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of $96.7M is lower than Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $184M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.51x while Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.77x versus 0.20x for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McGrath RentCorp has a net margin of 5.62% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of 16.49%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 2.59% beat McGrath RentCorp's return on equity of 12.73%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $92.45, signalling upside risk potential of 49.29%. On the other hand McGrath RentCorp has an analysts' consensus of $146.75 which suggests that it could grow by 40.54%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than McGrath RentCorp, analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than McGrath RentCorp.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McGrath RentCorp has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.86%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McGrath RentCorp offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp pays out 20.15% of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than McGrath RentCorp quarterly revenues of $256.4M. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of $96.7M is higher than McGrath RentCorp's net income of $42.3M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.51x while McGrath RentCorp's PE ratio is 17.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.77x versus 2.76x for McGrath RentCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System, Inc. has a net margin of 5.62% compared to U-Haul Holding Co.'s net margin of 4.35%. U-Haul Holding Co.'s return on equity of 2.59% beat Ryder System, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.29%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a consensus price target of $92.45, signalling upside risk potential of 49.29%. On the other hand Ryder System, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $201.33 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that U-Haul Holding Co. has higher upside potential than Ryder System, Inc., analysts believe U-Haul Holding Co. is more attractive than Ryder System, Inc..

U-Haul Holding Co. has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.634% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System, Inc. has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.931%.

U-Haul Holding Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System, Inc. offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. U-Haul Holding Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc. pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding Co. quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Ryder System, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2B. U-Haul Holding Co.'s net income of $96.7M is lower than Ryder System, Inc.'s net income of $138M. Notably, U-Haul Holding Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 53.51x while Ryder System, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding Co. is 1.77x versus 0.60x for Ryder System, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.