CTOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Herc Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net margin of 2.3%. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.98% beat Herc Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -4.28%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.07%. On the other hand Herc Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $173.20 which suggests that it could grow by 2.25%. Given that Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has higher upside potential than Herc Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is more attractive than Herc Holdings, Inc..

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Herc Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.780, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.953%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Herc Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Custom Truck One Source, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Herc Holdings, Inc. pays out 35.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Herc Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are smaller than Herc Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M is lower than Herc Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $30M. Notably, Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.40x while Herc Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 160.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is 0.78x versus 1.24x for Herc Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McGrath RentCorp has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net margin of 16.49%. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.98% beat McGrath RentCorp's return on equity of 12.73%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.07%. On the other hand McGrath RentCorp has an analysts' consensus of $147.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.56%. Given that McGrath RentCorp has higher upside potential than Custom Truck One Source, Inc., analysts believe McGrath RentCorp is more attractive than Custom Truck One Source, Inc..

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McGrath RentCorp has a beta of 0.503, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.688%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McGrath RentCorp offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Custom Truck One Source, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp pays out 20.15% of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are larger than McGrath RentCorp quarterly revenues of $256.4M. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M is lower than McGrath RentCorp's net income of $42.3M. Notably, Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.40x while McGrath RentCorp's PE ratio is 19.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is 0.78x versus 3.07x for McGrath RentCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Willis Lease Finance Corp. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net margin of 14.5%. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.98% beat Willis Lease Finance Corp.'s return on equity of 19.02%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.07%. On the other hand Willis Lease Finance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $160.00 which suggests that it could fall by -15.52%. Given that Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has higher upside potential than Willis Lease Finance Corp., analysts believe Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is more attractive than Willis Lease Finance Corp..

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Willis Lease Finance Corp. has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.648%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Willis Lease Finance Corp. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Custom Truck One Source, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Willis Lease Finance Corp. pays out 3.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Willis Lease Finance Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are larger than Willis Lease Finance Corp. quarterly revenues of $167.3M. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M is lower than Willis Lease Finance Corp.'s net income of $24.3M. Notably, Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.40x while Willis Lease Finance Corp.'s PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is 0.78x versus 2.11x for Willis Lease Finance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WillScot Holdings Corp. has a net margin of -1.19% compared to Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net margin of 7.65%. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.98% beat WillScot Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of 21.58%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.75, signalling upside risk potential of 17.07%. On the other hand WillScot Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $24.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.47%. Given that Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has higher upside potential than WillScot Holdings Corp., analysts believe Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is more attractive than WillScot Holdings Corp..

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a beta of 1.160, which suggesting that the stock is 16.012% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WillScot Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.276%.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WillScot Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Custom Truck One Source, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WillScot Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. quarterly revenues are $482.1M, which are smaller than WillScot Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $566.8M. Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s net income of -$5.8M is lower than WillScot Holdings Corp.'s net income of $43.3M. Notably, Custom Truck One Source, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 48.40x while WillScot Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. is 0.78x versus 1.71x for WillScot Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.