Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
43
CMDXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.77
Seasonality move
:
2.28%
Day range:
$3.77 - $3.84
52-week range:
$3.36 - $7.66
Dividend yield:
2.27%
P/E ratio:
21.46x
P/S ratio:
3.44x
P/B ratio:
4.84x
Volume:
17.9K
Avg. volume:
44.1K
1-year change:
-48.78%
Market cap:
$311.9M
Revenue:
$93.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMDXF
Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
|
$20.8M | -- | -2.8% | -- | -- |
|
AZ
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.
|
$4M | -- | 7.7% | -- | $20.00 |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
$14.1M | -- | 37.95% | -100% | $3.00 |
|
EXOD
Exodus Movement, Inc.
|
$30.3M | $0.20 | -26.83% | -93.55% | $37.67 |
|
SKKY
Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZENA
ZenaTech, Inc.
|
$2.8M | -$0.11 | 744.93% | -11.98% | $8.99 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMDXF
Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
|
$3.77 | -- | $311.9M | 21.46x | $0.01 | 2.27% | 3.44x |
|
AZ
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.
|
$6.40 | $20.00 | $268.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 32.87x |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
$1.03 | $3.00 | $97.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.60x |
|
EXOD
Exodus Movement, Inc.
|
$15.08 | $37.67 | $441.6M | 4.01x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.32x |
|
SKKY
Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.
|
$0.34 | -- | $18.1M | 261.54x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.35x |
|
ZENA
ZenaTech, Inc.
|
$3.76 | $8.99 | $142.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 18.92x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMDXF
Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
|
29.64% | -0.309 | 7.29% | 1.20x |
|
AZ
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.
|
2.81% | 1.567 | 0.62% | 5.22x |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
8.61% | -27.607 | 3.36% | 4.02x |
|
EXOD
Exodus Movement, Inc.
|
-- | -1.141 | -- | 4.14x |
|
SKKY
Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.
|
-- | 0.867 | 0.33% | 2.37x |
|
ZENA
ZenaTech, Inc.
|
43.8% | 4.862 | 10.51% | 4.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CMDXF
Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
|
$16.2M | $3.6M | 17.07% | 24.97% | 16.6% | -$2.3M |
|
AZ
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.
|
$383K | -$4.1M | -104.62% | -112.01% | -265.87% | -$4.6M |
|
CTM
Castellum, Inc.
|
$5.5M | $445.3K | -11.33% | -15.06% | 3.05% | $957K |
|
EXOD
Exodus Movement, Inc.
|
$13.4M | -$1.5M | 43.02% | 43.02% | -5.04% | -$5.7M |
|
SKKY
Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.
|
$482.1K | -$52.6K | 11.63% | 11.63% | -10.9% | $106.9K |
|
ZENA
ZenaTech, Inc.
|
$2.8M | -$3.5M | -62.8% | -106.3% | -110.49% | -$9.1M |
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CMDXF or AZ?
A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net margin of -90.43%. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of -112.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.73.87% $0.02 $91.6M AZA2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.24.76% -$0.04 $73.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CMDXF or AZ?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 212.5%. Given that A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. has higher upside potential than Computer Modelling Group Ltd., analysts believe A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. is more attractive than Computer Modelling Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.0 0 0 AZA2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.1 0 0 -
Is CMDXF or AZ More Risky?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 102.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. has a beta of 1.750, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.958%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMDXF or AZ?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computer Modelling Group Ltd. pays 73.59% of its earnings as a dividend. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMDXF or AZ?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net income of $2M is higher than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. is 3.44x versus 32.87x for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.3.44x 21.46x $21.9M $2M AZA2Z Cust2Mate Solutions Corp.32.87x -- $1.5M -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMDXF or CTM?
Castellum, Inc. has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net margin of 2.84%. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Castellum, Inc.'s return on equity of -15.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.73.87% $0.02 $91.6M CTMCastellum, Inc.37.56% $0.00 $40.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CMDXF or CTM?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Castellum, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 191.26%. Given that Castellum, Inc. has higher upside potential than Computer Modelling Group Ltd., analysts believe Castellum, Inc. is more attractive than Computer Modelling Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.0 0 0 CTMCastellum, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CMDXF or CTM More Risky?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 102.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum, Inc. has a beta of -4.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 592.067%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMDXF or CTM?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Castellum, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computer Modelling Group Ltd. pays 73.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum, Inc. pays out 1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMDXF or CTM?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than Castellum, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.6M. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net income of $2M is higher than Castellum, Inc.'s net income of $415.4K. Notably, Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Castellum, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. is 3.44x versus 1.60x for Castellum, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.3.44x 21.46x $21.9M $2M CTMCastellum, Inc.1.60x -- $14.6M $415.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns CMDXF or EXOD?
Exodus Movement, Inc. has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net margin of 56.16%. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Exodus Movement, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.73.87% $0.02 $91.6M EXODExodus Movement, Inc.44.02% $0.53 $296.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CMDXF or EXOD?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Exodus Movement, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.67 which suggests that it could grow by 149.78%. Given that Exodus Movement, Inc. has higher upside potential than Computer Modelling Group Ltd., analysts believe Exodus Movement, Inc. is more attractive than Computer Modelling Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.0 0 0 EXODExodus Movement, Inc.6 0 0 -
Is CMDXF or EXOD More Risky?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 102.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMDXF or EXOD?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Exodus Movement, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computer Modelling Group Ltd. pays 73.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMDXF or EXOD?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are smaller than Exodus Movement, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.3M. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net income of $2M is lower than Exodus Movement, Inc.'s net income of $17M. Notably, Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Exodus Movement, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. is 3.44x versus 3.32x for Exodus Movement, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.3.44x 21.46x $21.9M $2M EXODExodus Movement, Inc.3.32x 4.01x $30.3M $17M
-
Which has Higher Returns CMDXF or SKKY?
Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net margin of -3.19%. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.73.87% $0.02 $91.6M SKKYSkkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.99.88% -$0.00 $947K -
What do Analysts Say About CMDXF or SKKY?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc., analysts believe Computer Modelling Group Ltd. is more attractive than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.0 0 0 SKKYSkkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CMDXF or SKKY More Risky?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 102.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 169.667%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMDXF or SKKY?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computer Modelling Group Ltd. pays 73.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMDXF or SKKY?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $482.7K. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net income of $2M is higher than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$15.4K. Notably, Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 261.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. is 3.44x versus 7.35x for Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.3.44x 21.46x $21.9M $2M SKKYSkkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.7.35x 261.54x $482.7K -$15.4K
-
Which has Higher Returns CMDXF or ZENA?
ZenaTech, Inc. has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net margin of -282.41%. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 24.97% beat ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.73.87% $0.02 $91.6M ZENAZenaTech, Inc.90.19% -$0.24 $52.7M -
What do Analysts Say About CMDXF or ZENA?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ZenaTech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 86.2%. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than Computer Modelling Group Ltd., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than Computer Modelling Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.0 0 0 ZENAZenaTech, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CMDXF or ZENA More Risky?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 102.966% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CMDXF or ZENA?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.27%. ZenaTech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computer Modelling Group Ltd. pays 73.59% of its earnings as a dividend. ZenaTech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CMDXF or ZENA?
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are $21.9M, which are larger than ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s net income of $2M is higher than ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M. Notably, Computer Modelling Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.46x while ZenaTech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computer Modelling Group Ltd. is 3.44x versus 18.92x for ZenaTech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CMDXFComputer Modelling Group Ltd.3.44x 21.46x $21.9M $2M ZENAZenaTech, Inc.18.92x -- $3.2M -$8.9M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Buy
78
TVTX alert for Dec 27
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is down 1.54% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
