ZENA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a net margin of -209.85% compared to ZenaTech's net margin of -155.02%. ZenaTech's return on equity of -9.1% beat A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's return on equity of -42198.63%.

ZenaTech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 529.37%. Given that A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has higher upside potential than ZenaTech, analysts believe A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions is more attractive than ZenaTech.

ZenaTech has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ZenaTech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech quarterly revenues are $240.3K, which are smaller than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.1M. ZenaTech's net income of -$504.2K is higher than A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, ZenaTech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech is 478.37x versus 19.92x for A2Z Cust2Mate Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Femto Technologies has a net margin of -209.85% compared to ZenaTech's net margin of -5332.11%. ZenaTech's return on equity of -9.1% beat Femto Technologies's return on equity of -255.31%.

ZenaTech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Femto Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZenaTech has higher upside potential than Femto Technologies, analysts believe ZenaTech is more attractive than Femto Technologies.

ZenaTech has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Femto Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ZenaTech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Femto Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Femto Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech quarterly revenues are $240.3K, which are larger than Femto Technologies quarterly revenues of $74.5K. ZenaTech's net income of -$504.2K is higher than Femto Technologies's net income of -$4M. Notably, ZenaTech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Femto Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech is 478.37x versus 3.21x for Femto Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Earth Life Sciences has a net margin of -209.85% compared to ZenaTech's net margin of --. ZenaTech's return on equity of -9.1% beat Earth Life Sciences's return on equity of --.

ZenaTech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Earth Life Sciences has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZenaTech has higher upside potential than Earth Life Sciences, analysts believe ZenaTech is more attractive than Earth Life Sciences.

ZenaTech has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Earth Life Sciences has a beta of -0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.88%.

ZenaTech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Earth Life Sciences offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Earth Life Sciences pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech quarterly revenues are $240.3K, which are larger than Earth Life Sciences quarterly revenues of --. ZenaTech's net income of -$504.2K is higher than Earth Life Sciences's net income of --. Notably, ZenaTech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Earth Life Sciences's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech is 478.37x versus -- for Earth Life Sciences. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Two Hands has a net margin of -209.85% compared to ZenaTech's net margin of -185.58%. ZenaTech's return on equity of -9.1% beat Two Hands's return on equity of --.

ZenaTech has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Two Hands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZenaTech has higher upside potential than Two Hands, analysts believe ZenaTech is more attractive than Two Hands.

ZenaTech has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Two Hands has a beta of -2.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 337.542%.

ZenaTech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Two Hands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Two Hands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech quarterly revenues are $240.3K, which are larger than Two Hands quarterly revenues of $179.5K. ZenaTech's net income of -$504.2K is lower than Two Hands's net income of -$333.1K. Notably, ZenaTech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Two Hands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech is 478.37x versus 0.07x for Two Hands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.