ZENA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. has a net margin of -282.41% compared to ZenaTech, Inc.'s net margin of -178.89%. ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3% beat China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.83%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.99, signalling upside risk potential of 149.15%. On the other hand China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc..

ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. has a beta of -0.236, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.624%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are larger than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18K. ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is lower than China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.'s net income of -$32.2K. Notably, ZenaTech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech, Inc. is 14.14x versus 52.81x for China Yibai United Guarantee International Holding, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fact, Inc. has a net margin of -282.41% compared to ZenaTech, Inc.'s net margin of --. ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3% beat Fact, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.99, signalling upside risk potential of 149.15%. On the other hand Fact, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fact, Inc., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than Fact, Inc..

ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fact, Inc. has a beta of 7.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 676.356%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fact, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fact, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are larger than Fact, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is higher than Fact, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, ZenaTech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fact, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech, Inc. is 14.14x versus -- for Fact, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines Corp. has a net margin of -282.41% compared to ZenaTech, Inc.'s net margin of 28.34%. ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3% beat International Business Machines Corp.'s return on equity of 37.05%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.99, signalling upside risk potential of 149.15%. On the other hand International Business Machines Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $321.95 which suggests that it could grow by 33.03%. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than International Business Machines Corp., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than International Business Machines Corp..

ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines Corp. has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.275%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines Corp. offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. ZenaTech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp. pays out 60.09% of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than International Business Machines Corp. quarterly revenues of $19.7B. ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is lower than International Business Machines Corp.'s net income of $5.6B. Notably, ZenaTech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while International Business Machines Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech, Inc. is 14.14x versus 3.40x for International Business Machines Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -282.41% compared to ZenaTech, Inc.'s net margin of 7.58%. ZenaTech, Inc.'s return on equity of -106.3% beat Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.6%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.99, signalling upside risk potential of 149.15%. On the other hand Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ZenaTech, Inc. has higher upside potential than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc., analysts believe ZenaTech, Inc. is more attractive than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc..

ZenaTech, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. has a beta of -0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 145.247%.

ZenaTech, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZenaTech, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ZenaTech, Inc. quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are larger than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $653.5K. ZenaTech, Inc.'s net income of -$8.9M is lower than Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s net income of $49.5K. Notably, ZenaTech, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 229.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZenaTech, Inc. is 14.14x versus 5.64x for Skkynet Cloud Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.