CTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ExlService Holdings has a net margin of -26.62% compared to Castellum's net margin of 10.53%. Castellum's return on equity of -71.22% beat ExlService Holdings's return on equity of 22.62%.

Castellum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand ExlService Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.85%. Given that ExlService Holdings has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe ExlService Holdings is more attractive than Castellum.

Castellum has a beta of -3.380, which suggesting that the stock is 438.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ExlService Holdings has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.628%.

Castellum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ExlService Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Castellum pays -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. ExlService Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Castellum quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than ExlService Holdings quarterly revenues of $481.4M. Castellum's net income of -$2.7M is lower than ExlService Holdings's net income of $50.7M. Notably, Castellum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ExlService Holdings's PE ratio is 38.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Castellum is 1.34x versus 4.21x for ExlService Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -26.62% compared to Castellum's net margin of 4.19%. Castellum's return on equity of -71.22% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 59.94%.

Castellum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.36%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

Castellum has a beta of -3.380, which suggesting that the stock is 438.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Castellum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Castellum pays -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Castellum quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $46M. Castellum's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Exodus Movement's net income of $66.9M. Notably, Castellum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Castellum is 1.34x versus 13.54x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hackett Group has a net margin of -26.62% compared to Castellum's net margin of 4.5%. Castellum's return on equity of -71.22% beat The Hackett Group's return on equity of 28.92%.

Castellum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand The Hackett Group has an analysts' consensus of $35.67 which suggests that it could grow by 21.94%. Given that The Hackett Group has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe The Hackett Group is more attractive than Castellum.

Castellum has a beta of -3.380, which suggesting that the stock is 438.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hackett Group has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.469%.

Castellum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hackett Group offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Castellum pays -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hackett Group pays out 40.88% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hackett Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Castellum quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than The Hackett Group quarterly revenues of $79.2M. Castellum's net income of -$2.7M is lower than The Hackett Group's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Castellum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Hackett Group's PE ratio is 27.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Castellum is 1.34x versus 2.62x for The Hackett Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of -26.62% compared to Castellum's net margin of --. Castellum's return on equity of -71.22% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Castellum has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 8.49%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.69%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Marti Technologies, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Castellum has a beta of -3.380, which suggesting that the stock is 438.042% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Castellum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Castellum pays -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Castellum quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Castellum's net income of -$2.7M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Castellum's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Castellum is 1.34x versus 9.66x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.