CLKXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canterbury Park Holding has a net margin of 63.08% compared to TWC Enterprises's net margin of 10.48%. TWC Enterprises's return on equity of 9.04% beat Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 5.72%.

TWC Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canterbury Park Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TWC Enterprises has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe TWC Enterprises is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

TWC Enterprises has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.254, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.36%.

TWC Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Canterbury Park Holding offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. TWC Enterprises pays 20.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding pays out 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TWC Enterprises quarterly revenues are $49.7M, which are larger than Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues of $19.3M. TWC Enterprises's net income of $31.3M is higher than Canterbury Park Holding's net income of $2M. Notably, TWC Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Canterbury Park Holding's PE ratio is 22.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWC Enterprises is 1.59x versus 1.69x for Canterbury Park Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fansunite Entertainment has a net margin of 63.08% compared to TWC Enterprises's net margin of -46.51%. TWC Enterprises's return on equity of 9.04% beat Fansunite Entertainment's return on equity of -41.66%.

TWC Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fansunite Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TWC Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fansunite Entertainment, analysts believe TWC Enterprises is more attractive than Fansunite Entertainment.

TWC Enterprises has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fansunite Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TWC Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Fansunite Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. TWC Enterprises pays 20.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Fansunite Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TWC Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TWC Enterprises quarterly revenues are $49.7M, which are larger than Fansunite Entertainment quarterly revenues of $6.2M. TWC Enterprises's net income of $31.3M is higher than Fansunite Entertainment's net income of -$922.8K. Notably, TWC Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Fansunite Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWC Enterprises is 1.59x versus -- for Fansunite Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a net margin of 63.08% compared to TWC Enterprises's net margin of -13.93%. TWC Enterprises's return on equity of 9.04% beat Madison Square Garden Entertainment's return on equity of --.

TWC Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Madison Square Garden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $45.43 which suggests that it could grow by 28.73%. Given that Madison Square Garden Entertainment has higher upside potential than TWC Enterprises, analysts believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more attractive than TWC Enterprises.

TWC Enterprises has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TWC Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TWC Enterprises pays 20.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TWC Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TWC Enterprises quarterly revenues are $49.7M, which are smaller than Madison Square Garden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $138.7M. TWC Enterprises's net income of $31.3M is higher than Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, TWC Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while Madison Square Garden Entertainment's PE ratio is 9.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWC Enterprises is 1.59x versus 1.78x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a net margin of 63.08% compared to TWC Enterprises's net margin of --. TWC Enterprises's return on equity of 9.04% beat TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of --.

TWC Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOCCA Life Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TWC Enterprises has higher upside potential than TOCCA Life Holdings, analysts believe TWC Enterprises is more attractive than TOCCA Life Holdings.

TWC Enterprises has a beta of 0.011, which suggesting that the stock is 98.865% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.008, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.791%.

TWC Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.72%. TOCCA Life Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TWC Enterprises pays 20.98% of its earnings as a dividend. TOCCA Life Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TWC Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TWC Enterprises quarterly revenues are $49.7M, which are larger than TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues of --. TWC Enterprises's net income of $31.3M is higher than TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of --. Notably, TWC Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.59x while TOCCA Life Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TWC Enterprises is 1.59x versus -- for TOCCA Life Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.