CHDN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flutter Entertainment Plc has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of -20.8%. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat Flutter Entertainment Plc's return on equity of -2.27%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $136.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment Plc has an analysts' consensus of $296.52 which suggests that it could grow by 36.56%. Given that Flutter Entertainment Plc has higher upside potential than Churchill Downs, Inc., analysts believe Flutter Entertainment Plc is more attractive than Churchill Downs, Inc..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment Plc has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.276%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Flutter Entertainment Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment Plc quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than Flutter Entertainment Plc's net income of -$789M. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Flutter Entertainment Plc's PE ratio is 99.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.90x versus 2.51x for Flutter Entertainment Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of -13.68%. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $136.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $53.71 which suggests that it could grow by 0.03%. Given that Churchill Downs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp., analysts believe Churchill Downs, Inc. is more attractive than Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are larger than Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. quarterly revenues of $158.3M. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s net income of -$21.7M. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.'s PE ratio is 76.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.90x versus 2.68x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omnia Wellness, Inc. has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of --. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat Omnia Wellness, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $136.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand Omnia Wellness, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Churchill Downs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Omnia Wellness, Inc., analysts believe Churchill Downs, Inc. is more attractive than Omnia Wellness, Inc..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omnia Wellness, Inc. has a beta of -33.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3443.541%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. Omnia Wellness, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Omnia Wellness, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are larger than Omnia Wellness, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than Omnia Wellness, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while Omnia Wellness, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.90x versus 0.32x for Omnia Wellness, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of --. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of --.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $136.42, signalling upside risk potential of 19.13%. On the other hand TOCCA Life Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Churchill Downs, Inc. has higher upside potential than TOCCA Life Holdings, analysts believe Churchill Downs, Inc. is more attractive than TOCCA Life Holdings.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.111% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.364, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.396%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.38%. TOCCA Life Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. TOCCA Life Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are larger than TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.87x while TOCCA Life Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.90x versus -- for TOCCA Life Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.