CHDN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Canterbury Park Holding has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Churchill Downs's net margin of -10.4%. Churchill Downs's return on equity of 42.8% beat Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 2.53%.

Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $159.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.57%. On the other hand Canterbury Park Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Churchill Downs has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe Churchill Downs is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.316, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.626%.

Churchill Downs has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Canterbury Park Holding offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Churchill Downs pays 6.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding pays out 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs quarterly revenues are $624.2M, which are larger than Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues of $12M. Churchill Downs's net income of $71.7M is higher than Canterbury Park Holding's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Churchill Downs's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.45x while Canterbury Park Holding's PE ratio is 45.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs is 3.02x versus 1.55x for Canterbury Park Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Churchill Downs's net margin of -9.68%. Churchill Downs's return on equity of 42.8% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16%.

Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $159.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.57%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $57.77 which suggests that it could grow by 52.55%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Churchill Downs, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Churchill Downs.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.446%.

Churchill Downs has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs pays 6.84% of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs quarterly revenues are $624.2M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Churchill Downs's net income of $71.7M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M. Notably, Churchill Downs's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.45x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs is 3.02x versus 3.91x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Churchill Downs's net margin of 3.43%. Churchill Downs's return on equity of 42.8% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 0.95%.

Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $159.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.57%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $319.20 which suggests that it could grow by 34.55%. Given that Churchill Downs has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment PLC, analysts believe Churchill Downs is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment PLC.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.248%.

Churchill Downs has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs pays 6.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs quarterly revenues are $624.2M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Churchill Downs's net income of $71.7M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $130M. Notably, Churchill Downs's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.45x while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 1,078.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs is 3.02x versus 3.05x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming has a net margin of 11.49% compared to Churchill Downs's net margin of -100.39%. Churchill Downs's return on equity of 42.8% beat SharpLink Gaming's return on equity of --.

Churchill Downs has a consensus price target of $159.75, signalling upside risk potential of 44.57%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Churchill Downs has higher upside potential than SharpLink Gaming, analysts believe Churchill Downs is more attractive than SharpLink Gaming.

Churchill Downs has a beta of 0.926, which suggesting that the stock is 7.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.782%.

Churchill Downs has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.37%. SharpLink Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs pays 6.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs quarterly revenues are $624.2M, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming quarterly revenues of $881.7K. Churchill Downs's net income of $71.7M is higher than SharpLink Gaming's net income of -$885.1K. Notably, Churchill Downs's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.45x while SharpLink Gaming's PE ratio is 0.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs is 3.02x versus 0.34x for SharpLink Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.