CHDN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings, Inc. has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of 6.86%. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat DraftKings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.44%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.08, signalling upside risk potential of 47.35%. On the other hand DraftKings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.12 which suggests that it could grow by 66.37%. Given that DraftKings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Churchill Downs, Inc., analysts believe DraftKings, Inc. is more attractive than Churchill Downs, Inc..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings, Inc. has a beta of 1.668, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.767%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. DraftKings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are smaller than DraftKings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is lower than DraftKings, Inc.'s net income of $136.4M. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while DraftKings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.37x versus 1.89x for DraftKings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flutter Entertainment Plc has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of -20.8%. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat Flutter Entertainment Plc's return on equity of -2.27%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.08, signalling upside risk potential of 47.35%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment Plc has an analysts' consensus of $273.63 which suggests that it could grow by 126.1%. Given that Flutter Entertainment Plc has higher upside potential than Churchill Downs, Inc., analysts believe Flutter Entertainment Plc is more attractive than Churchill Downs, Inc..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment Plc has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.461%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Flutter Entertainment Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment Plc quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than Flutter Entertainment Plc's net income of -$789M. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Flutter Entertainment Plc's PE ratio is 99.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.37x versus 1.40x for Flutter Entertainment Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of 16.53%. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 108.66%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.08, signalling upside risk potential of 47.35%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $73.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Churchill Downs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, Inc., analysts believe Churchill Downs, Inc. is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts, Inc..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.963%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. pays out 32.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are larger than Red Rock Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues of $511.8M. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is lower than Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $84.6M. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.37x versus 3.27x for Red Rock Resorts, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive, Inc. has a net margin of 5.74% compared to Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net margin of 5.89%. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s return on equity of 37.25% beat Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.25%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a consensus price target of $138.08, signalling upside risk potential of 47.35%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $24.56 which suggests that it could grow by 32.59%. Given that Churchill Downs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, Inc., analysts believe Churchill Downs, Inc. is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive, Inc..

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.876% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive, Inc. has a beta of 1.542, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.196%.

Churchill Downs, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Rush Street Interactive, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Churchill Downs, Inc. pays 7.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Churchill Downs, Inc. quarterly revenues are $683M, which are larger than Rush Street Interactive, Inc. quarterly revenues of $324.9M. Churchill Downs, Inc.'s net income of $39.2M is higher than Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s net income of $19.1M. Notably, Churchill Downs, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.08x while Rush Street Interactive, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Churchill Downs, Inc. is 2.37x versus 3.31x for Rush Street Interactive, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.