DKNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 3.43%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 0.95%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $319.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.08%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment PLC, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment PLC.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, which suggesting that the stock is 107.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.248%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.8B. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $130M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 1,098.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.98x versus 3.11x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 13.55%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 43.3%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $114.76 which suggests that it could grow by 9.82%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, which suggesting that the stock is 107.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.588, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.78%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $797M. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $108M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 28.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.98x versus 2.97x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 0.8%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 1.32%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 41.64%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, which suggesting that the stock is 107.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $254.2M. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $2M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 593.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.98x versus 1.44x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of -109.62%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat SharpLink Gaming's return on equity of 15958.29%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.77, signalling upside risk potential of 49.9%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than SharpLink Gaming, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than SharpLink Gaming.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, which suggesting that the stock is 107.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming has a beta of 1.198, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.782%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SharpLink Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming quarterly revenues of $823.4K. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than SharpLink Gaming's net income of -$902.7K. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SharpLink Gaming's PE ratio is 0.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.98x versus 0.35x for SharpLink Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.