BYD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings, Inc. has a net margin of 14.54% compared to Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net margin of -22.45%. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s return on equity of 108.39% beat DraftKings, Inc.'s return on equity of -28.46%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a consensus price target of $91.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand DraftKings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $44.51 which suggests that it could grow by 26.5%. Given that DraftKings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming Corp., analysts believe DraftKings, Inc. is more attractive than Boyd Gaming Corp..

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings, Inc. has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.136%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. DraftKings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boyd Gaming Corp. pays 10.98% of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than DraftKings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than DraftKings, Inc.'s net income of -$256.8M. Notably, Boyd Gaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while DraftKings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming Corp. is 1.69x versus 3.24x for DraftKings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a net margin of 14.54% compared to Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net margin of -9.85%. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s return on equity of 108.39% beat Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a consensus price target of $91.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Full House Resorts, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 38.38%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming Corp., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Boyd Gaming Corp..

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.648%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Full House Resorts, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boyd Gaming Corp. pays 10.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues of $78M. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Boyd Gaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while Full House Resorts, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming Corp. is 1.69x versus 0.32x for Full House Resorts, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. has a net margin of 14.54% compared to Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net margin of -3.01%. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s return on equity of 108.39% beat Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.17%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a consensus price target of $91.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.40 which suggests that it could grow by 7.55%. Given that Boyd Gaming Corp. has higher upside potential than Golden Entertainment, Inc., analysts believe Boyd Gaming Corp. is more attractive than Golden Entertainment, Inc..

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment, Inc. has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.655%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Golden Entertainment, Inc. offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Boyd Gaming Corp. pays 10.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment, Inc. pays out 58.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Golden Entertainment, Inc. quarterly revenues of $154.8M. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Boyd Gaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s PE ratio is 151.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming Corp. is 1.69x versus 1.21x for Golden Entertainment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a net margin of 14.54% compared to Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net margin of 16.17%. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s return on equity of 108.39% beat Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 116.18%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a consensus price target of $91.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.57 which suggests that it could grow by 11.74%. Given that Boyd Gaming Corp. has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, Inc., analysts believe Boyd Gaming Corp. is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts, Inc..

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a beta of 1.242, which suggesting that the stock is 24.225% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.656%.

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Boyd Gaming Corp. pays 10.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. pays out 39.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming Corp. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Red Rock Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net income of $1.4B is higher than Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $76.9M. Notably, Boyd Gaming Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.56x while Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming Corp. is 1.69x versus 3.01x for Red Rock Resorts, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.