FLL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 14.54%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat Boyd Gaming Corp.'s return on equity of 108.39%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.38%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $91.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.82%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming Corp., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Boyd Gaming Corp..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming Corp. has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.225%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boyd Gaming Corp. offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming Corp. pays out 10.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Boyd Gaming Corp. quarterly revenues of $1B. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net income of $1.4B. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Boyd Gaming Corp.'s PE ratio is 3.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.32x versus 1.69x for Boyd Gaming Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of -3.01%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.17%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.38%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.40 which suggests that it could grow by 7.55%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Golden Entertainment, Inc., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Golden Entertainment, Inc..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment, Inc. has a beta of 1.517, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.655%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Entertainment, Inc. offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment, Inc. pays out 58.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Golden Entertainment, Inc. quarterly revenues of $154.8M. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s PE ratio is 151.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.32x versus 1.21x for Golden Entertainment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 58.38%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.95%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.38%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 429.8%. Given that High Roller Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Full House Resorts, Inc., analysts believe High Roller Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Full House Resorts, Inc..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.32x versus 0.47x for High Roller Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 16.17%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 116.18%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 38.38%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.57 which suggests that it could grow by 15.51%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, Inc., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts, Inc..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.648% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.527, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.656%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. pays out 39.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Red Rock Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $76.9M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.32x versus 2.91x for Red Rock Resorts, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.