FLL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Gaming Corp. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 13.07%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat Boyd Gaming Corp.'s return on equity of 95.73%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $94.47 which suggests that it could grow by 9.59%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming Corp., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Boyd Gaming Corp..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.404, which suggesting that the stock is 40.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming Corp. has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.699%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boyd Gaming Corp. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming Corp. pays out 3.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Boyd Gaming Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Boyd Gaming Corp.'s net income of $138.8M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Boyd Gaming Corp.'s PE ratio is 3.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.27x versus 1.72x for Boyd Gaming Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings, Inc. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 6.86%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat DraftKings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.44%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand DraftKings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.12 which suggests that it could grow by 66.37%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than DraftKings, Inc., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than DraftKings, Inc..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.404, which suggesting that the stock is 40.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings, Inc. has a beta of 1.668, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.767%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than DraftKings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than DraftKings, Inc.'s net income of $136.4M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DraftKings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.27x versus 1.89x for DraftKings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment, Inc. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of -3.01%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.17%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $30.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.6%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Golden Entertainment, Inc., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Golden Entertainment, Inc..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.404, which suggesting that the stock is 40.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment, Inc. has a beta of 1.467, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.748%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Golden Entertainment, Inc. offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment, Inc. pays out 58.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Golden Entertainment, Inc. quarterly revenues of $154.8M. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s net income of -$4.7M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Golden Entertainment, Inc.'s PE ratio is 156.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.27x versus 1.24x for Golden Entertainment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a net margin of -9.85% compared to Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net margin of 16.53%. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of -126.39% beat Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s return on equity of 108.66%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.75, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $73.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Full House Resorts, Inc. has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, Inc., analysts believe Full House Resorts, Inc. is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts, Inc..

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.404, which suggesting that the stock is 40.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts, Inc. has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.963%.

Full House Resorts, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Full House Resorts, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts, Inc. pays out 32.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Full House Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues are $78M, which are smaller than Red Rock Resorts, Inc. quarterly revenues of $511.8M. Full House Resorts, Inc.'s net income of -$7.7M is lower than Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s net income of $84.6M. Notably, Full House Resorts, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Rock Resorts, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Full House Resorts, Inc. is 0.27x versus 3.27x for Red Rock Resorts, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.