CNTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of -5.22% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of 4.36%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.91%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.64%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Century Casinos, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Century Casinos.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, which suggesting that the stock is 159.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.031%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $155.7M, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $78M. Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M is lower than Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 80.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.18x versus 0.83x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of -5.22% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of 7.83%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6%.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.91%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $109.94 which suggests that it could grow by 28.71%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, which suggesting that the stock is 159.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.06%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $155.7M, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $817M. Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $64M. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.18x versus 2.49x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -5.22% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of -6.67%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.91%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, which suggesting that the stock is 159.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $155.7M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.18x versus 1.61x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming has a net margin of -5.22% compared to Century Casinos's net margin of -100.39%. Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21% beat SharpLink Gaming's return on equity of --.

Century Casinos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.91%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than SharpLink Gaming, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than SharpLink Gaming.

Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, which suggesting that the stock is 159.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming has a beta of 1.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.242%.

Century Casinos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SharpLink Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos quarterly revenues are $155.7M, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming quarterly revenues of $881.7K. Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M is lower than SharpLink Gaming's net income of -$885.1K. Notably, Century Casinos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SharpLink Gaming's PE ratio is 0.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos is 0.18x versus 0.74x for SharpLink Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.