CNTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flutter Entertainment Plc has a net margin of -6.11% compared to Century Casinos, Inc.'s net margin of -20.8%. Century Casinos, Inc.'s return on equity of -207.88% beat Flutter Entertainment Plc's return on equity of -2.27%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.56%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment Plc has an analysts' consensus of $296.52 which suggests that it could grow by 37.89%. Given that Century Casinos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment Plc, analysts believe Century Casinos, Inc. is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment Plc.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a beta of 1.921, which suggesting that the stock is 92.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment Plc has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.401%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $153.7M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment Plc quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Century Casinos, Inc.'s net income of -$9.4M is higher than Flutter Entertainment Plc's net income of -$789M. Notably, Century Casinos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment Plc's PE ratio is 99.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos, Inc. is 0.07x versus 2.49x for Flutter Entertainment Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment, Inc. has a net margin of -6.11% compared to Century Casinos, Inc.'s net margin of -2.2%. Century Casinos, Inc.'s return on equity of -207.88% beat Inspired Entertainment, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.56%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 44.23%. Given that Century Casinos, Inc. has higher upside potential than Inspired Entertainment, Inc., analysts believe Century Casinos, Inc. is more attractive than Inspired Entertainment, Inc..

Century Casinos, Inc. has a beta of 1.921, which suggesting that the stock is 92.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment, Inc. has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.472%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $153.7M, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment, Inc. quarterly revenues of $86.2M. Century Casinos, Inc.'s net income of -$9.4M is lower than Inspired Entertainment, Inc.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Century Casinos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspired Entertainment, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.88x for Inspired Entertainment, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -6.11% compared to Century Casinos, Inc.'s net margin of 58.38%. Century Casinos, Inc.'s return on equity of -207.88% beat High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -66.95%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.56%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 288.35%. Given that High Roller Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Casinos, Inc., analysts believe High Roller Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Century Casinos, Inc..

Century Casinos, Inc. has a beta of 1.921, which suggesting that the stock is 92.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $153.7M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Century Casinos, Inc.'s net income of -$9.4M is lower than High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $3.7M. Notably, Century Casinos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos, Inc. is 0.07x versus 0.64x for High Roller Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming, Inc. has a net margin of -6.11% compared to Century Casinos, Inc.'s net margin of -14824.39%. Century Casinos, Inc.'s return on equity of -207.88% beat SharpLink Gaming, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.15%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a consensus price target of $3.00, signalling upside risk potential of 125.56%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.25 which suggests that it could grow by 294.3%. Given that SharpLink Gaming, Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Casinos, Inc., analysts believe SharpLink Gaming, Inc. is more attractive than Century Casinos, Inc..

Century Casinos, Inc. has a beta of 1.921, which suggesting that the stock is 92.061% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming, Inc. has a beta of 11.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1012.429%.

Century Casinos, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SharpLink Gaming, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Casinos, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Casinos, Inc. quarterly revenues are $153.7M, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.8M. Century Casinos, Inc.'s net income of -$9.4M is lower than SharpLink Gaming, Inc.'s net income of $104.2M. Notably, Century Casinos, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SharpLink Gaming, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Casinos, Inc. is 0.07x versus 32.78x for SharpLink Gaming, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.