TLIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Casinos has a net margin of -- compared to TOCCA Life Holdings's net margin of -5.22%. TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Casinos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.91%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than TOCCA Life Holdings, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than TOCCA Life Holdings.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.059, which suggesting that the stock is 105.873% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.595%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Casinos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TOCCA Life Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Casinos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Century Casinos quarterly revenues of $155.7M. TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M. Notably, TOCCA Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Century Casinos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TOCCA Life Holdings is -- versus 0.18x for Century Casinos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Canterbury Park Holding has a net margin of -- compared to TOCCA Life Holdings's net margin of 10.48%. TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 5.72%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canterbury Park Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TOCCA Life Holdings has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe TOCCA Life Holdings is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.059, which suggesting that the stock is 105.873% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.263, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.308%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canterbury Park Holding offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. TOCCA Life Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding pays out 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues of $19.3M. TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Canterbury Park Holding's net income of $2M. Notably, TOCCA Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Canterbury Park Holding's PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TOCCA Life Holdings is -- versus 1.68x for Canterbury Park Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to TOCCA Life Holdings's net margin of -13.93%. TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Madison Square Garden Entertainment's return on equity of --.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Madison Square Garden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $44.57 which suggests that it could grow by 33.45%. Given that Madison Square Garden Entertainment has higher upside potential than TOCCA Life Holdings, analysts believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more attractive than TOCCA Life Holdings.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.059, which suggesting that the stock is 105.873% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TOCCA Life Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Madison Square Garden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $138.7M. TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, TOCCA Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Madison Square Garden Entertainment's PE ratio is 9.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TOCCA Life Holdings is -- versus 1.68x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to TOCCA Life Holdings's net margin of -6.67%. TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of -- beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TOCCA Life Holdings has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe TOCCA Life Holdings is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.059, which suggesting that the stock is 105.873% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TOCCA Life Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of -- is lower than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, TOCCA Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TOCCA Life Holdings is -- versus 1.61x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.