CPHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Casinos has a net margin of 10.48% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of -5.22%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 5.72% beat Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Casinos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 66.91%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.595%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Century Casinos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Casinos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $19.3M, which are smaller than Century Casinos quarterly revenues of $155.7M. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of $2M is higher than Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while Century Casinos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.68x versus 0.18x for Century Casinos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a net margin of 10.48% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of -13.93%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 5.72% beat Madison Square Garden Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Madison Square Garden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $44.57 which suggests that it could grow by 33.45%. Given that Madison Square Garden Entertainment has higher upside potential than Canterbury Park Holding, analysts believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more attractive than Canterbury Park Holding.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $19.3M, which are smaller than Madison Square Garden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $138.7M. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of $2M is higher than Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while Madison Square Garden Entertainment's PE ratio is 9.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.68x versus 1.68x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 10.48% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of -6.67%. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 5.72% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canterbury Park Holding has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Canterbury Park Holding is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $19.3M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of $2M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.68x versus 1.61x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOCCA Life Holdings has a net margin of 10.48% compared to Canterbury Park Holding's net margin of --. Canterbury Park Holding's return on equity of 5.72% beat TOCCA Life Holdings's return on equity of --.

Canterbury Park Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOCCA Life Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Canterbury Park Holding has higher upside potential than TOCCA Life Holdings, analysts believe Canterbury Park Holding is more attractive than TOCCA Life Holdings.

Canterbury Park Holding has a beta of -0.263, which suggesting that the stock is 126.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOCCA Life Holdings has a beta of 2.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.873%.

Canterbury Park Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. TOCCA Life Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Canterbury Park Holding pays 13.11% of its earnings as a dividend. TOCCA Life Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canterbury Park Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Canterbury Park Holding quarterly revenues are $19.3M, which are larger than TOCCA Life Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Canterbury Park Holding's net income of $2M is higher than TOCCA Life Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Canterbury Park Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.23x while TOCCA Life Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Canterbury Park Holding is 1.68x versus -- for TOCCA Life Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.