Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
47
CICHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.01
Seasonality move
:
4.65%
Day range:
$1.01 - $1.04
52-week range:
$0.76 - $1.31
Dividend yield:
8.19%
P/E ratio:
7.13x
P/S ratio:
1.40x
P/B ratio:
0.56x
Volume:
1.8K
Avg. volume:
79K
1-year change:
19.64%
Market cap:
$262.9B
Revenue:
$195.8B
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $14.14 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corp.
|
$1.01 | -- | $262.9B | 7.13x | $0.03 | 8.19% | 1.40x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 23.05x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.80x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$5.22 | -- | $22.9B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 8.82% | 0.59x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0098 | -- | $312.1K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.01x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$6.09 | -- | $25.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.84x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$12.05 | $14.14 | $797.2M | 9.21x | $1.16 | 9.6% | 2.37x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corp.
|
73.63% | 0.614 | 494.24% | 0.00x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | 0.921 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 0.014 | -- | 32.62x |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | 113.926 | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -5.773 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.6% | 2.126 | 1.1% | 3.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICHF
China Construction Bank Corp.
|
-- | $12.3B | 2.92% | 10.21% | 66.56% | $15.2B |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
JPPYY
Jupai Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.9M | $21.4M | 6.58% | 6.63% | 23.96% | $80M |
China Construction Bank Corp. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CICHF or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 22.31% compared to China Construction Bank Corp.'s net margin of --. China Construction Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 10.21% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.-- -- $1.8T CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CICHF or CCGDF?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Construction Bank Corp. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CICHF or CCGDF More Risky?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.246, which suggesting that the stock is 75.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.112, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICHF or CCGDF?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.19%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank Corp. pays 30.25% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 56.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICHF or CCGDF?
China Construction Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9B, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank Corp.'s net income of $10.9B is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.13x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank Corp. is 1.40x versus 0.80x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.1.40x 7.13x $48.9B $10.9B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.80x 23.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CICHF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 22.31% compared to China Construction Bank Corp.'s net margin of 34.61%. China Construction Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 10.21% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.-- -- $1.8T CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About CICHF or CMAKY?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe China Construction Bank Corp. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CICHF or CMAKY More Risky?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.246, which suggesting that the stock is 75.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICHF or CMAKY?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.19%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 8.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. China Construction Bank Corp. pays 30.25% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICHF or CMAKY?
China Construction Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9B, which are larger than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. China Construction Bank Corp.'s net income of $10.9B is higher than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, China Construction Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.13x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank Corp. is 1.40x versus 0.59x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.1.40x 7.13x $48.9B $10.9B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.59x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns CICHF or JPPYY?
Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 22.31% compared to China Construction Bank Corp.'s net margin of --. China Construction Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 10.21% beat Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.-- -- $1.8T JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CICHF or JPPYY?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jupai Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than Jupai Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Construction Bank Corp. is more attractive than Jupai Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.0 0 0 JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CICHF or JPPYY More Risky?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.246, which suggesting that the stock is 75.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jupai Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 13.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1251.811%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICHF or JPPYY?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.19%. Jupai Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank Corp. pays 30.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Jupai Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICHF or JPPYY?
China Construction Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9B, which are larger than Jupai Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank Corp.'s net income of $10.9B is higher than Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.13x while Jupai Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank Corp. is 1.40x versus 0.01x for Jupai Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.1.40x 7.13x $48.9B $10.9B JPPYYJupai Holdings Ltd.0.01x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CICHF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 22.31% compared to China Construction Bank Corp.'s net margin of --. China Construction Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 10.21% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.-- -- $1.8T MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CICHF or MAAS?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe China Construction Bank Corp. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CICHF or MAAS More Risky?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.246, which suggesting that the stock is 75.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 196.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICHF or MAAS?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.19%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank Corp. pays 30.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICHF or MAAS?
China Construction Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9B, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank Corp.'s net income of $10.9B is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.13x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank Corp. is 1.40x versus 2.84x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.1.40x 7.13x $48.9B $10.9B MAASMaase, Inc.2.84x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CICHF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 22.31% compared to China Construction Bank Corp.'s net margin of 34.3%. China Construction Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 10.21% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.63%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.-- -- $1.8T NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.97.43% $0.43 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CICHF or NOAH?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $14.14 which suggests that it could grow by 17.39%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Construction Bank Corp., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Construction Bank Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 1 0 -
Is CICHF or NOAH More Risky?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.246, which suggesting that the stock is 75.352% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICHF or NOAH?
China Construction Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.19%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. China Construction Bank Corp. pays 30.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICHF or NOAH?
China Construction Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $48.9B, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $89.1M. China Construction Bank Corp.'s net income of $10.9B is higher than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $30.6M. Notably, China Construction Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.13x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank Corp. is 1.40x versus 2.37x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICHFChina Construction Bank Corp.1.40x 7.13x $48.9B $10.9B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2.37x 9.21x $89.1M $30.6M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
