Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
45
CEBCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.44
Seasonality move
:
5.02%
Day range:
$0.44 - $0.44
52-week range:
$0.39 - $0.55
Dividend yield:
6.09%
P/E ratio:
7.56x
P/S ratio:
0.72x
P/B ratio:
0.36x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
1.4K
1-year change:
-3.4%
Market cap:
$26B
Revenue:
$35.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEBCF
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$86.4M | -- | 0.88% | -- | $13.25 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEBCF
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.
|
$0.44 | -- | $26B | 7.56x | $0.01 | 6.09% | 0.72x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $5.1B | 18.32x | $0.00 | 2.49% | 0.89x |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
$21.68 | -- | $60.3B | 6.90x | $0.53 | 6.99% | 1.29x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
$4.85 | -- | $21.2B | 4.94x | $0.19 | 9.5% | 0.44x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
$5.90 | -- | $24.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.75x |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$10.02 | $13.25 | $656.4M | 8.99x | $1.16 | 11.5% | 1.91x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEBCF
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.
|
80.76% | 0.294 | 905.92% | 0.00x |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
81.79% | -0.478 | -- | 2.47x |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
80.16% | 0.428 | 760.59% | 0.00x |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
61.65% | 1.010 | -- | 32.62x |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -8.335 | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
0.61% | 2.419 | 1.25% | 3.52x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEBCF
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.
|
-- | $2.2B | 1.49% | 7.68% | 73.47% | $34.6B |
|
CCGDF
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.28% | 1.39% | -- | -- |
|
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | $2.4B | 1.86% | 8.76% | 58.62% | $7.5B |
|
CMAKY
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.96% | 4.87% | 129.19% | -$16.2B |
|
MAAS
Maase, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NOAH
Noah Holdings Ltd.
|
$100.8M | $36M | 5.52% | 5.57% | 34.61% | $51.9M |
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CEBCF or CCGDF?
China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 20.46% compared to China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.68% beat China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.-- $0.03 $410.8B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.-- -- $150.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CEBCF or CCGDF?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is more attractive than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0 0 0 CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEBCF or CCGDF More Risky?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.104, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.386%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEBCF or CCGDF?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.09%. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. pays 29.74% of its earnings as a dividend. China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. pays out 49.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEBCF or CCGDF?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B is higher than China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is 0.72x versus 0.89x for China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0.72x 7.56x $8.6B $1.8B CCGDFChina Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd.0.89x 18.32x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEBCF or CHCJY?
China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of 20.46% compared to China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net margin of 15.45%. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.68% beat China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.-- $0.03 $410.8B CHCJYChina CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.-- $0.68 $550B -
What do Analysts Say About CEBCF or CHCJY?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd., analysts believe China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is more attractive than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0 0 0 CHCJYChina CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEBCF or CHCJY More Risky?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.094%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEBCF or CHCJY?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.09%. China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. pays 29.74% of its earnings as a dividend. China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. pays out 22.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEBCF or CHCJY?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are smaller than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $12.2B. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B is lower than China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.'s net income of $1.9B. Notably, China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 6.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is 0.72x versus 1.29x for China CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0.72x 7.56x $8.6B $1.8B CHCJYChina CITIC Bank Corp. Ltd.1.29x 6.90x $12.2B $1.9B
-
Which has Higher Returns CEBCF or CMAKY?
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a net margin of 20.46% compared to China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net margin of 34.61%. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.68% beat China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.-- $0.03 $410.8B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.-- $0.40 $236B -
What do Analysts Say About CEBCF or CMAKY?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd., analysts believe China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is more attractive than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0 0 0 CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEBCF or CMAKY More Risky?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. has a beta of 0.283, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.744%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEBCF or CMAKY?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.09%. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. offers a yield of 9.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. pays 29.74% of its earnings as a dividend. China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. pays out 21.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEBCF or CMAKY?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $5.1B. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B is higher than China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is 0.72x versus 0.44x for China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0.72x 7.56x $8.6B $1.8B CMAKYChina Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.0.44x 4.94x $5.1B $1.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns CEBCF or MAAS?
Maase, Inc. has a net margin of 20.46% compared to China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.68% beat Maase, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.-- $0.03 $410.8B MAASMaase, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEBCF or MAAS?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maase, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Maase, Inc., analysts believe China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Maase, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0 0 0 MAASMaase, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CEBCF or MAAS More Risky?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase, Inc. has a beta of -0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.387%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEBCF or MAAS?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.09%. Maase, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. pays 29.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Maase, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEBCF or MAAS?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Maase, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B is higher than Maase, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while Maase, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is 0.72x versus 2.75x for Maase, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0.72x 7.56x $8.6B $1.8B MAASMaase, Inc.2.75x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEBCF or NOAH?
Noah Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of 20.46% compared to China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net margin of 1.36%. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.68% beat Noah Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.-- $0.03 $410.8B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.96.99% $0.03 $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CEBCF or NOAH?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noah Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Noah Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd., analysts believe Noah Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0 0 0 NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.2 2 0 -
Is CEBCF or NOAH More Risky?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.266, which suggesting that the stock is 73.427% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noah Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.796, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.415%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEBCF or NOAH?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.09%. Noah Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 11.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. pays 29.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Noah Holdings Ltd. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEBCF or NOAH?
China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are $8.6B, which are larger than Noah Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $103.9M. China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s net income of $1.8B is higher than Noah Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $1.4M. Notably, China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.56x while Noah Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Bank Co. Ltd. is 0.72x versus 1.91x for Noah Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEBCFChina Everbright Bank Co. Ltd.0.72x 7.56x $8.6B $1.8B NOAHNoah Holdings Ltd.1.91x 8.99x $103.9M $1.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 3
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 3
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 3
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
