CBAUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of 16.06%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.77 which suggests that it could grow by 242.22%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Commonwealth Bank of Australia, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.35x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 8.45x versus 3.78x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.35x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 8.45x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Strategic Elements.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.35x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 8.45x versus 1,864.39x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.963% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.5%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.35x while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 2.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 8.45x versus 2.08x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.