CMSQY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Commonwealth Bank of Australia has an analysts' consensus of $74.40 which suggests that it could fall by -30.83%. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Computershare.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.38%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays out 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.30x while Commonwealth Bank of Australia's PE ratio is 28.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.85x versus 10.21x for Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of 16.06%. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $17.93 which suggests that it could grow by 172.94%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Computershare.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.30x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.85x versus 4.10x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macquarie Group has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Macquarie Group.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.114%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.30x while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.85x versus 11.21x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.853%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.30x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.85x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.